And why not Shanahan? He is the constant in the chart, not Purdy, after all. The majority of games with those conditions came prior to Purdy. The team is far more often leading heading into the 4th quarter under Purdy's tenure, after all. I'm curious what the logic is, here.
Is the conclusion that the teams at the top have the best QBs from 2017 to today? In that case, the Steelers, Titans, Broncos, and Bears are among the teams with the best QBs during this period?
That would mean the teams at the bottom have the worst QBs. So Burrow, Dak, Herbert, and Lawrence are ass?
Or is the conclusion that the teams at the bottom have the best coaching? Teams like the Panthers, Giants, Raiders.
And then the teams at the top have the worst coaching? Teams like the Chiefs, Vikings, Bills, Steelers, Rams, Ravens.
Teach me how to draw conclusions from charts you can't read.