- Joined
- Jul 10, 2007
- Messages
- 47,419
- Reaction score
- 67,493
Most racist thing in nature is how we call the white one “great white shark” and the black one “killer whale”
This is why we kneel.
The GOAT giving thoughts on the GOAT
I doubt she would be in a gay barI wouldnt let her buy Corona a beer
The GOAT giving thoughts on the GOAT
@Madmick Purdgoat has 1/3 of these lmao
Yeah, he fucking sucks and is carried by a top 5 qb. Insanely lucky.Yeah, any Niners fans has seen those figures flown up a million times in the past 3 years. It's pretty obvious that if Shannie hasn't gotten the other team figured out before the game, he isn't going to change that on the fly.
Yawn strawman.Yeah, he fucking sucks and is carried by a top 5 qb. Insanely lucky.
It means Purdy is ass. And no I didnt.Yawn strawman.
I'm not sure what you guys are taking away from this stat. Setting the bar at 8+ points limits the data set to such a small number it becomes pretty much impossible to draw any conclusions from a stat that is already not necessarily conveying strong indicators. Also I don't understand what 1/3 for Purdy is supposed to mean. I'm guessing @PUO3 meant 0/3.
What does 1/3 mean? Also, explain how this chart shows Purdy is ass.It means Purdy is ass. And no I didnt.
Yawn strawman.
How did they not use this for Braun Strowman?
1/3 of those games are with Brock TurdyWhat does 1/3 mean? Also, explain how this chart shows Purdy is ass.
No, that's me, I don't watch it. I won't get any wrestling reference that doesn't involve a star who transcends that sphere. Stopped watching after the Hulk Hogan era when I was a kid. I only know the Rocks, Cenas, etc.Failed wrestling reference lol
Also thought this was hilarious
Have you seen that recent commercial where the coach asks the AI to filter out the defensive ends with leadership skills? LMFAO, the computer is going to tell you who is a leader.
All I can think when I watch that commercial is, "If the AI is going to do all your goddamn work then who the fuck needs to pay you?"
ofc it's a strawman; this isn't a debate and I don't respect your opinion on the matterYawn strawman.
I'm not sure what you guys are taking away from this stat. Setting the bar at 8+ points limits the data set to such a small number it becomes pretty much impossible to draw any conclusions from a stat that is already not necessarily conveying strong indicators. Also I don't understand what 1/3 for Purdy is supposed to mean. I'm guessing @PUO3 meant 0/3.