- Joined
- Sep 30, 2016
- Messages
- 42,606
- Reaction score
- 70,629
In addition to tasting awful, this stuff brings on the worst multi-day migraines I've ever had.
i FELT LIKE THAT WITH MAD HONEYMy brain hurts when I consume artificial sweeteners. Feels like poison.
This is the main reason why I try to avoid them. Sugar is bad too so I just rarely eat sweet things.I'm more interested in the role artificial sweeteners play in altering your gut microbiome.
P17-031-25 Association Between Artificial Sweetener
Consumption and Risk of Incident Diabetes: The CARDIA study
Hejingzi Jia 1 , Lyn M Steffen 1 , So-Yun Yi 1 , Xia Zhou 1 ,
Brian Steffen 1 , James G Terry 2 , Elizabeth R Lusczek 1 ,
James M Shikany 3 , Linda Van Horn 4 , David R Jacobs 1
1 University of Minnesota, United States
2 Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States
3 The University of Alabama at Birmingham, United States
4 Northwestern University, United States
Objectives: The prevalence of diabetes has risen sharply over
the past decades. Artificial sweeteners (ArtSw) are widely used
as sugar substitutes which have been linked to adverse health
outcomes. This study examined the association between ArtSw
intake and incident diabetes risk. We hypothesize that higher
ArtSw intake increases incident diabetes risk.
Methods: This analysis included 4,654 adults (54.4% female,
50.1% white) enrolled in the Coronary Artery Risk Development
in Young Adults (CARDIA) study who were mean age 24.9 years
at baseline in 1985-86. Dietary intake was assessed by the
CARDIA diet history at year 0 (Y0), Y7, and Y20 cumulative
average intakes of ArtSw, diet beverage, aspartame, and sucra-
lose were calculated. Diabetes was defined as fasting glucose
greater than or equal to 126 mg/dl, OGTT 2-hour glucose greater
than or equal to 200 mg/dl, hemoglobin A1C greater than or
equal to 6.5%, or use of diabetes medications at follow-up visits.
Time-dependent multivariable cox proportional hazard regres-
sion models were used to assess associations of incident diabetes
across quintiles of ArtSw, diet beverages, aspartame, or sucralose
intakes through year 30. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race,
field center, education, energy intake, physical activity, smoking
status, alcohol drinking, diet quality, and family history of
diabetes.
Results: Over a median follow-up of 30 years (691 incident
diabetes events), participants in quintile 5 of diet beverage
intake had significantly higher risk of developing diabetes
compared to those in quintile 1 (hazard ratio: 2.29; 95% CI:
1.66–3.18; p trend< 0.001). Positive associations were also
observed for intakes of saccharin (HR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.37–3.21;
ptrend¼0.013). Adjusting for waist circumference attenuated the
associations slightly. Associations were not significant for total
ArtSw, sucralose, or aspartame intake with incidence of diabetes.
Conclusions: Higher intakes of diet beverage and saccharin
were associated with an increased risk of incident diabetes.
These findings highlight the need to evaluate the long-term
metabolic effect of ArtSw on glucose metabolism.
Funding Sources: CARDIA is supported by the National
Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Exactly buddy only natural food as Waheguru intended jiWe need to protect the high fructose corn syrup plant at all costs!
Wait...people who regularly consumed diet beverages or drinks sweetened with saccharin were more than two times as likely to develop type 2 diabetes than those who rarely consumed them.
I have seen fat people at Sam's Club food court ordering hot dogs + soda + pizza as if hot dog not enough and also fried pork rinds big tub in the shopping cart.The real problem is that people think they can eat the worst possible unhealthy stuff and then have a diet Coke and everything's cool. I used to work with a guy that weighed like 350 lbs. We'd go to lunch and he'd get a double cheese burger with extra mayo, super-sized fries with an extra- large diet Coke. Not hard to find the problem there.
Rats are biologically similar to humans and they have relatively short life spans, so they're useful as test subjects, but obviously they are not quite 1:1 with humans. They also generally use far higher dosages than would be applicable for people, just to be on the safe side.Been drinking a lot of sugar free gatorade recently.
I looked at the ingredients ... 'sweetener 950 and 955'.
I looked them up. One is 'Ace-K... has caused cancer in rats.
The other was Splendor - no long term studies, can affect blood sugar and insulin levels.
Good old fine print. And these are considered safe ones
Thats good to know Sherbro. Thanks.Rats are biologically similar to humans and they have relatively short life spans, so they're useful as test subjects, but obviously they are not quite 1:1 with humans. They also generally use far higher dosages than would be applicable for people, just to be on the safe side.
The ADI for a 80 kg adult for Ace-K would be like 14 litres of Gatorade a day, and you'd still be within safe limits, you're probably more likely to get water poisoning from drinking that much of it than getting teh cancer from Ace-K.
Bro you became a mod? Ave Corinthian!This.
People who drink diet sodas may or may not be doing so in addition to consuming other crap food, and along with bad lifestyle habits in general.
It tells you, at least a little bit about someone if they usually drink that stuff or if they rarely drink it.
I'm more interested in the role artificial sweeteners play in altering your gut microbiome.
Same thing for me, dont know anyone else who really feels the same but since ive started avoiding processed and artificial crap everytime I even smell something along those lines my monkey brain kicks in and I know no human should be consuming that crap.My brain hurts when I consume artificial sweeteners. Feels like poison.