- Joined
- Mar 21, 2004
- Messages
- 43,757
- Reaction score
- 15,656
You could maybe argue Fury Road as well, wasn't nominally called a reboot but I think in a lot of respects really was. Questionable whether it was better than the Road Warrior of course as I think both are great films but at the very least it didn't represent a significant downgrade.
I think you also see the difference in politics as well, Fury Road is actually IMHO a far more political film than the Ghostbusters remake with a female co lead rebelling against whats essential a cult of "toxic masculinity". Its a film with some weight to it by an ambitious director, it tells the story it wants to tell and for me does it well. The Ghostbuster reboot though is a pretty empty film made by a not very ambitious hacksih director, its politics really only exists as tokenism to sell the film. Its the same with Starwars sequels for me, very little weight to those films and what political points The Last Jedi makes are feel poorly developed and ham fisted afterthoughts, the main politics involved is using tokenism to sell a product in a cynical fashion and the end result IMHO is that ti actually damages the causes it claims to support.
I didn’t like Fury Road. But I also didn’t really like Mad Max either. I never picked up on Fury Road being about toxic masculinity. But I never really read into shit in movies. I just watch them to enjoy them for what they are, entertainment. I take them at face value. I didn’t think Ghostbusters was about feminism as much as I thought it was just a ridiculous movie with a bunch of SNL like bits they thought were funny.
All this reading into shit reminds me of that Southpark where they read Catcher in the Rye. I honestly don’t think the writers intend for there to be many of the themes that people retroactive read into them.