- Joined
- Apr 12, 2010
- Messages
- 10,535
- Reaction score
- 19
It's Michael Jordan and it's not even close. In 15 years these porn brain rotted morons will tell you space jam was real.
Wow… this place has idiocracied itself to posts of this level… sad.
It's Michael Jordan and it's not even close. In 15 years these porn brain rotted morons will tell you space jam was real.
Who are you? LmaoWow… this place has idiocracied itself to posts of this level… sad.
You're only saying this cuz your warriors are getting bodied on the glass lmaoBoth teams are playing terribly, 1st half has been pretty sloppy with dashes of brilliance thrown in.
You're only saying this cuz your warriors are getting bodied on the glass lmao
looney isn't playing vs a bitch ass white boy anymore
Metrics are for nerds imo
Metrics look good when your entire gameplan is based around making a player look good. Remember when Sam Bradfords metrics were amazing for the Vikings?
Accurate takeWarriors are too small , Lefraud HGh is going to most likely own them
I don't dismiss them, I just know there are things outside of the analytics that are influencing them. So I can't take them to the bank and cash em as an argument for Joker being MVP. They fucked over Harden and the analytics showed he's the GOATYou don't need complex metrics for Jokic dominance and his impact on teammates who miraculously see results above career averages when playing with him. Just basic team records when playing and basic stats are are clearly indicative, and it's not close. In just three to five years everyone is going to look back at this award not going to Jokic as a joke.
Of course there is a sea of advanced analytics out there, and one can cherry pick interesting individual results, but to dismiss them entirely based on that is beyond foolish, especially in cases where the vast majority of different models reach the same conclusion and reinforce each other and reinforce the basic stats.
As a bit of an aside, the book "Thinking Fast and Slow" is great for examining the reliability of "expert judgment" versus reliability of formulas. A great read.
I don't dismiss them, I just know there are things outside of the analytics that are influencing them. So I can't take them to the bank and cash em as an argument for Joker being MVP. They fucked over Harden and the analytics showed he's the GOAT
I don't dismiss them, I just know there are things outside of the analytics that are influencing them. So I can't take them to the bank and cash em as an argument for Joker being MVP. They fucked over Harden and the analytics showed he's the GOAT