- Joined
- Jan 4, 2015
- Messages
- 2,600
- Reaction score
- 0
I not sure you are understanding what I'm saying.
You asserted that because there is debate about something that means it's real this is not the case take the debate about god as an example.
I'm not trying to disprove your point I'm just pointing out your argument is flawed.
I understand PERFECTLY what you are saying but I can tell that you still do not understand what I'M saying. What I am saying is that white privilege is real because it has been a heated topic of debate and the reason it is a heated topic of debate is because there people who have felt the effects and continue to feel the effects of white supremacy and what it does.
NOW, if I had said that God is real for the fact that we are debating about it THEN you would have had an argument. In other words, your assertion is mixing apples and oranges. I personally would never say that something non verifiable (existence of god, aliens, ghosts, telekinesis, life after death, etc.) is real just because it's a topic of debate. I would only say something is real as a topic of debate as long as that which is debated (is Tom Brady the best to have ever done it, is Jon Jones a low life or not, does white supremacy exist or not) is real and verifiable and there are people who have actual experiences with what we are debating. So there are other NFL players who have experienced Tom Brady's greatness. There is D.C. and that pregnant lady who has experienced Bone's destructive behavior and there are non white people who have experienced the sting and hurt of white supremacy.
My apologies for the long post, I felt the need to go into the above explanation to make sure what I have been saying is now clear and why I disagree with the argument you came with. I thought you knew where I was coming from from the beginning but I don't think that was the case.
Last edited: