• Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version.

Navy Vet Attacked By Secret Police

A protest to a brutal police state where extrajudicial killings go unpunished is now being met by secret police abducting people in unmarked vans.

This is where America is now.

No, it isn't where America is now. It's not a brutal police state, nor are secret police abdicating people. There are unmarked vans though. That part seems true.
 
So we have a one sided story from a doggy news source about a man who doesn't know the law approaching Police against their instruction getting what he deserved? Did I miss anything?
photo.jpg
 
It's the dept of homeland security which both dems and repubs bipartisanly created when they decided the best way to fight terror back in 2001 was to trample on the rights of US citizens. Reaping what you sow
 
giphy.gif


Funny how a brutal communist tank driver, showed more restrained than America's secret police.


giphy.gif



Granted, that didn't seem like the best time to ask questions to America's secret police tho.
 
Tell me this... @Sketch

If this guy was in debt, how much would a Dem group need to pay him to do this, keeping in mind that no arrested protesters/rioters have been charged in this district even when arrested?

Now, compare that sum to the sum for paid advertisements that would dominate the news cycle for two whole days.

Now, factor in that most partisan Dems get a boner when they see this:
51s0VuMUnzL_1200x1200.jpg


Now factor in that nearly EVERY search result for "Johnny Cash Finger" in images returns a site to purchase a product with this image on it, clearly establishing that there is a vibrant brand (prob via his estate) around flipping off authority.

To me that sum is $25k for a real loser, but in this case $70k-$100k because this dude is built to take a beating and possibly got a locker room bonus from Uncie Dana
 
Police only read Miranda when they are questioning otherwise Miranda doesn't apply. So you have no clue if they were read their Miranda rights by the police.

The guy in the video that was picked up and put in the unmarked mini van said they took him to the court house and mirandized him.

If you'd read the article instead of the outrage-porn headline you would know that too.
 
The guy in the video that was picked up and put in the unmarked mini van said they took him to the court house and mirandized him.

If you'd read the article instead of the outrage-porn headline you would know that too.
Police don't read Miranda unless they are asking him questions. Even if the police said they did, I wouldn't believe them. There is absolutely no reason for them to read any Miranda rights.

The article in the OP doesn't even mention anything about Miranda.
 
You guys keep screaming about terrorist groups to defend secret police rounding up people without charges. Problem is, for all of your screeching, the DOJ hasn't done jack shit about Antifa, BLM or any of these groups and labelling them as terrorist groups.

Why in the fuck do you reason that is???????

This is what happens when you declare war against your government and perform enough terrorist acts to get designated a terrorist organization. You get treated like the terrorists you are. It's appropriate. Antifa is admittedly at war with the U.S. government. Was it unconstitutional for the United States to use its federal might against the Confederate Army? Should the United States government have allowed the Confederate Army to wage war uncontested?

Nope!! Dead wrong, as per usual. Anything to justify a modern Stasi in action.
 
You guys keep screaming about terrorist groups to defend secret police rounding up people without charges. Problem is, for all of your screeching, the DOJ hasn't done jack shit about Antifa, BLM or any of these groups and labelling them as terrorist groups.

Why in the fuck do you reason that is???????



Nope!! Dead wrong, as per usual. Anything to justify a modern Stasi in action.
May 31, 2020:

"It is time to stop watching the violence and to confront and stop it. The continued violence and destruction of property endangers the lives and livelihoods of others, and interferes with the rights of peaceful protestors, as well as all other citizens.
--------------------------------
Federal law enforcement actions will be directed at apprehending and charging the violent radical agitators who have hijacked peaceful protest and are engaged in violations of federal law.

To identify criminal organizers and instigators, and to coordinate federal resources with our state and local partners, federal law enforcement is using our existing network of 56 regional FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF).

The violence instigated and carried out by Antifa and other similar groups in connection with the rioting is domestic terrorism and will be treated accordingly.”
-Billy P.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/atto...-barrs-statement-riots-and-domestic-terrorism

I'd wager this is them "doing something" how about you?
 
Because a half baked article that shows a guy not following police orders during a social disturbance, is an idiot? Yeah sorry pal but these riots have gotten out of hand. This was the Dems playing chicken with Trump and seeing how far they could push things. Now unfortunately feds have to be involved because these mayors refuse to run their cities. So here we are and if that makes me a bootlicker, that makes you a didlo rider

Who needs an article? Just watch the video. The federal troops aren't in the middle of any action, they are standing by when the guy walks up to talk to them when one tees off on him with a baton. You are illustrating my point beautifully though - somehow some middle age dude going to ask federal police a question - in what all evidence suggests was good faith - is part of 'Dems playing chicken with Trump', as if the partisanship involved is sufficient to justify shit that we were all united in criticising when it was posted in Hong Kong protest videos a few months ago.

Fed involvement appears to be backfiring, the protests that were fizzling have been reenergised by unnecessary shit like this and the head of DHS is writing internal memos that they should get some troops that actually have training in crowd control. Which is how you know that the order for their deployment came from the top.
 
May 31, 2020:

"It is time to stop watching the violence and to confront and stop it. The continued violence and destruction of property endangers the lives and livelihoods of others, and interferes with the rights of peaceful protestors, as well as all other citizens.
--------------------------------
Federal law enforcement actions will be directed at apprehending and charging the violent radical agitators who have hijacked peaceful protest and are engaged in violations of federal law.

To identify criminal organizers and instigators, and to coordinate federal resources with our state and local partners, federal law enforcement is using our existing network of 56 regional FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF).

The violence instigated and carried out by Antifa and other similar groups in connection with the rioting is domestic terrorism and will be treated accordingly.”
-Billy P.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/atto...-barrs-statement-riots-and-domestic-terrorism

I'd wager this is them "doing something" how about you?

It's another in a long line of Bill Barr declarations. He's made a lot of those in strong fashion for the President, yet, funnily enough, nothing seems to come from them after the pr mess has died down.

Again, I'm wondering why the DOJ isn't labelling them as a terrorist group.
 
Who needs an article? Just watch the video. The federal troops aren't in the middle of any action, they are standing by when the guy walks up to talk to them when one tees off on him with a baton. You are illustrating my point beautifully though - somehow some middle age dude going to ask federal police a question - in what all evidence suggests was good faith - is part of 'Dems playing chicken with Trump', as if the partisanship involved is sufficient to justify shit that we were all united in criticising when it was posted in Hong Kong protest videos a few months ago.

Fed involvement appears to be backfiring, the protests that were fizzling have been reenergised by unnecessary shit like this and the head of DHS is writing internal memos that they should get some troops that actually have training in crowd control. Which is how you know that the order for their deployment came from the top.
I don't see a video. It's a simple CNN article with other pics and such attached.
 
To identify criminal organizers and instigators, and to coordinate federal resources with our state and local partners, federal law enforcement is using our existing network of 56 regional FBI Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF).
I'd bet dollars to cents when the JTTFs read this there was equal amount of laughs and eye rolls. 'Agents, apparently we need you to take breaks from the child trafficking cases and the billion dollar fraud case. It says here we need you to... arrest college kids with bandanas when they throw rocks at a protest.'
 
It's another in a long line of Bill Barr declarations. He's made a lot of those in strong fashion for the President, yet, funnily enough, nothing seems to come from them after the pr mess has died down.

Again, I'm wondering why the DOJ isn't labelling them as a terrorist group.
What is his deal anyway? I don't see the point in selling out any and all integrity and objectivity. It's like what you'd expect from some random joe Fox News top fan that got dropped into the AG position.
 
It's another in a long line of Bill Barr declarations. He's made a lot of those in strong fashion for the President, yet, funnily enough, nothing seems to come from them after the pr mess has died down.

Again, I'm wondering why the DOJ isn't labelling them as a terrorist group.
Okay.

The most recent report I can find referencing this release is from National Public Radio dated July 1st, a month after release, 2/3 of a month ago from this post, and it doesn't even show signs of responding to a "PR mess":



So let's agree this action is "seeming to come from them after the PR mess has died down" shall we?

You falsely claimed "The DOJ hasn't done jack shit about Antifa, BLM or any of these groups and labelling them as terrorist groups.

Why in the fuck do you reason that is???????"

Why in the fuck did you reason to do that, considering the first search result for "DOJ declares ANTIFA terrorist" was the DOJ's May 31st release? Did you even look for an answer to your question before posting? At what percentile would you rank your search-fu in 2020? If you couldn't find this before posting an angry question with seven question marks after it, then what amount of credibility would you say that lends to the import of your posts here in general?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top