- Joined
- Dec 27, 2013
- Messages
- 3,864
- Reaction score
- 191
Good replies in Here. Up I'm Washington we have a lot of native Americans.
A lot of tribes worked with the Europeans. Spain had a history of working both with and against the same tribes, so it's not like anyone is lying here.No prob, I'm just saying.. some Apache don't take kindly to being told they fought with someone they were and still are enemies with.
I knew your post was influenced by that book lol. It really surprised if me to learn just how brutal they were in war, especially with their captives. And they weren't alone, they practiced scalping ceremonies and ritualistic cannibalism up in the Great Lakes too.
As a warrior approached the point on the circle nearest the enemy, he dropped into the loop around his horse's neck and shot arrows from beneath the neck. If his horse was shot down, he generally landed on his feet.
I grew up in the heart of Comanche territory, there's a giant arrow in my home town for Quanah Parker. I even went to a school that was named the Comanches. So I was really happy to see that book when I was working at a book store a few years ago.Lol yea, I actually learned about the book from a thread on these boards. Brutal indeed.
Comanche horsemanship skills, and their enormous striking range with said horses, seriously impressed me. Their mustangs were bred for enduring long distances.
Dudes were nice.
It's crazy seeing how similar the struggle for land was here in comparison with the seizing of Africa. The Europeans were experienced in playing indigenous people against eachother and exacerbating previous tensions.I totally agree.. there were tons of playing off of each other during the wars.. here in the South West it really wasn't any British or American Europeans, Americans just did the mopping up. In the southwest it was constant war with the Spanish and Mexicans for hundreds of years..
I believe the PC term is firewater.i honestly don't know anything about their current culture, aside from there being a huge alcohol issue in their reservations.
Part of it is that they aren't a culture of crybabies looking for massive handouts for something that happened 150+ years ago like...some other cultures. Also, some of them (not all) are making out like friggin' bandits with that casino money.
Also, Jews don't seem to complain nearly as much as...some other cultures, probably because most of their oppression didn't occur in America. They can't point as many fingers.
Typical white ignorant response downplaying the devastating effects that you're people's atrocities have on their victims, insulting anyone with a voice as crybabies. You are scum.Part of it is that they aren't a culture of crybabies looking for massive handouts for something that happened 150+ years ago like...some other cultures. Also, some of them (not all) are making out like friggin' bandits with that casino money.
Also, Jews don't seem to complain nearly as much as...some other cultures, probably because most of their oppression didn't occur in America. They can't point as many fingers.
Typical white ignorant response downplaying the devastating effects that you're people's atrocities have on their victims, insulting anyone with a voice as crybabies. You are scum.
Part of it is that they aren't a culture of crybabies looking for massive handouts for something that happened 150+ years ago like...some other cultures. Also, some of them (not all) are making out like friggin' bandits with that casino money.
Also, Jews don't seem to complain nearly as much as...some other cultures, probably because most of their oppression didn't occur in America. They can't point as many fingers.
Don't give me that bullshit that the Sioux were "just" at war. The Sioux were out to wipe out other tribes, aka extermination. That's why they chased the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikira 3/4 of the way across the state. That's just in ND. There's some members in this forum whose tribes got slaughtered by the Sioux and pushed out of their home land.<[analyzed}>
Careful bud, you don't wanna inadvertently conflate war with war for extermination. It's certainly true that some tribes were extremely warlike, even to the point where conflict between tribes often came first as a priority before conflict with whites (something the US gov gladly exploited at every turn), but the concept of specifically trying to exterminate people/culture based on cultural or religious reasons is, broadly speaking, imported. In my tribe, for example, if you went down south on a raid and killed a guy then realized he had a kid around, it wasn't uncommon to take that child in and adopt them as a full member of the tribe. Indeed, it was often looked at as a responsibility to do so.