Again, of course there are non-title main events. Yes, I really think there wasn't going to be a title fight, because there wasn't one scheduled until after the Conor vs Diaz 2 fight fell through. It is a matter of fact that you can look up.
So ufc 200 wouldn’t have any title fights?
Doubt that...
This has nothing to do with a non-title fight main eventing over a title fight. Also, DC vs Silva was never announced as a main event....
So? It was exactly the same as ufc 196.
The main event fell through n one of the main event guys got a replacement opponent.
It non title fight can’t main event over title fight, then Conor vs Nate should’ve been pushed to co main. That didn’t happen.
The Conor Diaz 1 fight is the EXCEPTION not my "logic." I am saying the exact opposite: Non-title fights do not main event over title fights when there is a title fight on the card.
In other words the drawing power of McGregor > title fight
Here we have a similar thing
Where co main has 3 times more views than main event. Ppl I general are more interested in Pettis vs Nate fight than dc vs stipe regardless what’s on the line.
An interim title fight is a title fight lol. I am waiting for an example of a NON-TITLE FIGHT maining over a title fight on the same card.
Oh, so ufc marketing plot of increasing ppv sales by adding a “interim title” is still a “title fight”?
K...
This fight just happens to sell by itself n doesn’t need “interim title” on the line.
N let’s not act like ufc doesn’t give gift title fights or “interim titles” left n right.
Btw if you’re still waiting for an answer to your gotcha question:
Ufc 21
Main event
Maurice smith vs Marco Ruas
Co main
Pat miletich vs pederneias