- Joined
- Feb 22, 2005
- Messages
- 52,253
- Reaction score
- 26,429
I find CT's to almost exclusively be the bastion of the stupid and logically challenged.
But by the same token, as someone who prides themselves on evaluating things based on logic and reasoning, its incredibly hard to make any traditional logical sense of is his recent trade and Ukraine decisions.
Given Occam's razor, complete stupidity, or planned incompetence suddenly becomes the most logical explanations.
Baffling.
If you really look at how crashed economies make the wealthy wealthier, it really isn't that farfetched of a thought. The housing crisis saw massive systemic fraud uncovered, did any of the complicit bankers or officials see any prison time over it? People lost jobs and homes, immigrants and the working class were scapegoated for taking loans they didnt know were predatory. The Government could have chosen to bail out the working class directly and let the banking industry rot and crumble. They chose to bail out the banks because, well, Obama was chummy with those Wachovia d*ckheads.
During COVID Trump dumped what, 1.5 trillion dollars down the toilet that is the stockmarket. Did it work? All those PPP loans misused for stock buybacks and no convictions for that, or for laying off the personnel those loans were meant to bolster the employment of. As always shareholders get made whole, meanwhile McConnell did everything he could to prevent working class Americans from getting a single cent of our own money. Trump was just good enough of a con artist to sign his name on the checks the Democrats battled his party tooth and nail to get. As well as take credit for the child tax credit they knew they intended to revoke at the first given opportunity. The Republicans openly stated they wanted us all working despite the global crisis, and these lemmings were ready to applaud as they kept from the cliff.
Americans are ALWAYS told the Government cant spend any money on average citizens while the donor class are constantly showered with subsidies even amidst disaster and cataclysm.
This is no different. Guys like Must, Bozo, and Cuckerberg likely just calculate how much of a hit they can take while still being wealthy enough to purchase influence, and that the price of many things will reduce as things crash. How much ahead they are doesn't change. I suspect their "net worth" is about as meaningless to them as it is to me, aside from that they know its meaningful to people who want their favor. Hence why they're never satisfied. Trump isnt either. I dont think there is any situation they dont think they can monetize, especially if they know the working class will take the harder hit and continue to look at them as betters, as saviors.
Edit: I just realized this concept I'm describing happened in many people's favorite Christmas movie, which took place during the Great Depression. Who was the one @sshole acquiring assets during that time?
And remember Potter had his money the entire time, a clever depiction of the kind of fraud and trickery the capitalists always engage in. And Potter wanted the member-owned B&L so he could dismantle it and force everyone to use his privately-owned bank, which would also lead to him owning their properties.
Last edited: