News Mysterious drones over New Jersey

[KnightTemplar]

Great point

Government response has been Full Retard,

"We don't know where these Drones come from, who's operating them or what they want - but there is no threat! Trust me, bro!"

 

[Slobodan]

View attachment 1076007

@Fuzzybabyducks did you shoot this one down?

 

[PBAC]

Next time someone on sherdog spots one can you look on flight radar and check if its not just a plane. If it went through the efforr of wearing warning lights theyre probably traced too

 

[Sobek]

Government response has been Full Retard,

"We don't know where these Drones come from, who's operating them or what they want - but there is no threat! Trust me, bro!"

'Back to work slaves! No talking!'

 

[Sobek]

This may be the worst government response to anything in recent times.

 

[Renard]

I still can't figure out what the angle is. Although if this keeps going eventually enough breadcrumbs will fall out to get a decent hypothesis going.

I wouldn't be surprised if this were something boring like the deep state – CIA, DoD, DHS or whichever agency is involved – wants the authority to fly drones all over the place with impunity to surveil the domestic population, so they're staging this little song and dance to claim new drone legislation is needed to allow them to police the sky against foreign threats like Chy-na or iRAN. After having seen a demonstration of what that could look like, the public acquiesces and they get what they want. Classic example of problem, reaction, solution.

They love making people feel clever because people rarely question things when they feel they've gotten one over. They always plant the "truth" they want you to find so you feel smart when you find it, for example the "Covid lab leak," which is also not what happened, but something put there for the contrarians to find. Same deal here. If they admit to something, anything, people will exclaim "HA, I knew something was happening!" and the thinking ends there.

 

[Versez]

I’m scared …. Very scared they should I offer @SalvadorAllende as a sacrifice to them.

 

[Rob Battisti]

View attachment 1076007

That’s an AI image.

for example the "Covid lab leak," which is also not what happened

 

[Phisher]

Government response has been Full Retard,

"We don't know where these Drones come from, who's operating them or what they want - but there is no threat! Trust me, bro!"

That was a bad response. They should've just said that there's no evidence of anything suspicious because there isn't.

Now that there are a bunch of people on the ground actively scrutinizing this, most of the "drone" sightings are just aircraft that can be verified and tracked with real-time transponder data.


There's also a bunch of idiots, like the former governor of Maryland, confusing stars for drones.


It's amazing how easy it is to kick off a mass hysteria event.

 

[Rob Battisti]

That was a bad response. They should've just said that there's no evidence of anything suspicious because there isn't.

Now that there are a bunch of people on the ground actively scrutinizing this, most of the "drone" sightings are just aircraft that can be verified and tracked with real-time transponder data.


There's also a bunch of idiots, like the former governor of Maryland, confusing stars for drones.


It's amazing how easy it is to kick off a mass hysteria event.

Finally — we have the water carrier for the government showing up.

Nothing to see, folks. Go back inside.

 

[Captain Tenneal]

 

[tabascojet]

Finally — we have the water carrier for the government showing up.

Nothing to see, folks. Go back inside.

It's easy to dismiss it all until you see them in person. Some pilot in my town is a skeptic and ranting about ppl with laser pointers as if everyone is out to blind pilots.

 

[tabascojet]

What's the fallout radius for this alleged warhead....asking for a friend

 

[Rob Battisti]

It's easy to dismiss it all until you see them in person. Some pilot in my town is a skeptic and ranting about ppl with laser pointers as if everyone is out to blind pilots.

There is enough video evidence alongside military and police reporting to effectively tell anyone who says “nothing is happening” to pound sand.

 

[Rob Battisti]

What's the fallout radius for this alleged warhead....asking for a friend

I used to have that as my leading theory but now the fact it’s only at night pokes holes in it

 

[Wilmer Digreux]

Why would they need such a contrived and potentially expensive operation an excuse?

Don’t you think they could just do it and say it’s necessary to keep up with modern day national security? It’s not like they’re changing the constitution or taking away civil rights.
You don’t need a false flag operation to update drone regulatory laws, unless you think they are gonna outright ban them draconian china style.

Even then, don’t you think they could come up with a much simpler false flag event?

Who knows? My guess would be they (Navy and other agencies) are testing out some new tech while at the same time using those tests to create enough fear that people will be begging them to change the laws.

If they didn't do it that way people might fight against the legislation changes since more drone capabilities at more local levels means one step closer to a total police state.

What I do know is every single cop and politician at that briefing went on at length about changing the laws. And they said they are voting on it this Tuesday. Hmm.

 

[Captain Tenneal]

What's the fallout radius for this alleged warhead....asking for a friend

Depends on the device

A tactical nuke will have a yield of 50 kilotons, while a strategic nuke could have double that.

But this is just some guy's theory

 

[Rob Battisti]

Who knows? My guess would be they (Navy and other agencies) are testing out some new tech while at the same time using those tests to create enough fear that people will be begging them to change the laws.

If they didn't do it that way people might fight against the legislation changes since more drone capabilities at more local levels means one step closer to a total police state.

What I do know is every single cop and politician at that briefing went on at length about changing the laws. And they said they are voting on it this Tuesday. Hmm.

This has become my leading theory

 

[Rob Battisti]

@Wilmer Digreux it really wouldn’t be that hard. Get people riled up. They then confuse anything for a drone. Then you simply implement anything they want.

 

[chill doggie]

Who knows? My guess would be they (Navy and other agencies) are testing out some new tech while at the same time using those tests to create enough fear that people will be begging them to change the laws.

If they didn't do it that way people might fight against the legislation changes since more drone capabilities at more local levels means one step closer to a total police state.

What I do know is every single cop and politician at that briefing went on at length about changing the laws. And they said they are voting on it this Tuesday. Hmm.

The test theory doesn’t make sense, these things are at full capability already.
And no one is begging to change laws, the thing the public is demanding is full honesty from the government.
A big portion if not the majority of people deduce this is the work of the government already, given they that they see no urgency to take them down and they assure you there is no threat.
And the public wants them to be taken down if they are not in fact ours.

The police and politicians representing the state of NJ want to change laws only because airspace is solely regulated by the feds, state and municipal law enforcement departments don’t have the authority to take down any drone since they all fall under the authority of the FAA, the legislation changes they are talking about is to expand their powers so they don’t have to rely on the feds because they aren’t doing anything.
No one has suggested to expand deep state/feds power.