No, I'm saying the benefits from harvesting mars would have to be massive given the costs to get there. In other words, we would need a massive jump in technology to make it worth it.lol are you saying we can't do that? When a country heavily invests heavily in space techolgy we naturally get more advanced. we were suppose to be on mars in the 1970s, but plans where canceled. We already knew how to get there, an were about to drop a couple billion to get there.
We were already on the moon in the freakin 60's id say if we made it there, imagine where we would be if the nasa budget never changed.
No, I'm saying the benefits from harvesting mars would have to be massive given the costs to get there. In other words, we would need a massive jump in technology to make it worth it.
I'm not acting like anything. My main point in here was to ask why anyone would want to live on mars (it's worse than living in Antartica) and someone pointed out we could harvest. I said that's a good point just not cost effective yet.lol your acting like it isnt worth it. We are already doing asteroid mining or pushing to start asteroid mining.
True. I suppose that was just me ranting a bit, and somewhat overlooking the point of why you brought up that example. However, I did cover how I felt about what you're saying in my posts here. I feel there are still space projects to get involved in that can drive technology that are much more sensible, as well as beneficial to humanity - such as asteroid deflection.
Bolstering life here is more practical and important, imo, than Mars colonization, at this point in time (which, as I've stated from the beginning, I believe to be putting the cart before the horse.)
I'm not acting like anything. My main point in here was to ask why anyone would want to live on mars (it's worse than living in Antartica) and someone pointed out we could harvest. I said that's a good point just not cost effective yet.
I think you're reading too far here.
Maybe. But people who live in extreme areas of Earth like Antartica (scientists) and rough parts of Alaska go batshit crazy.well we need to figure out if we can terraform it,besides mankind needs to start looking to the stars to colonize and maybe get rid of some of the stress on earth
From where I'm sitting, pragmatism doesn't involve colonizing Mars. But clearly that's where we disagree. Still, I thank you for providing your alternative viewpoint, and I promise you it has been considered with respect, not simply written off because it was not in-line with my taken stance.
Are you familiar with the Fermi paradox, interesting stuff
So where the heck is everybody ?
Yes! That's what I was trying to remember. I knew it wasn't the Drake equation, but wasn't sure. Thanks for the link. The simulation proposal is the nuttiest one in my opinion. What. The. Fuck?
In any event...
![]()
Wayward Pines sounds familiar. How many seasons is that?