Social ***mozilla Firefox ceo forced to resign for personal views****

[James Keith]

...I'm not really against it but it's not a real right like traditional marriage...

How do you get him saying this? I thought he was just saying marriage is not a right.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Pulling a TCK, eh?

Lmao!!

 

[TheComebackKid]

I am for society denying it but am also for society accepting it if it will make 50% plus happy, I'm not really against it but it's not a real right like traditional marriage. This combined with your posts supporting SSm after pages of trolling against it is just a cluster fuck. Lol at me even responding my bad.

I've said none of this but why start being honest now right?

*shrugs*

 

[ben236]

Yeah pretty much what I was thinking.

Lmao!!

Okay... maybe you two are a little slow.

I'm not against SSM, in fact I completely support it. I completely support polygamy as well because I'm not a hypocrite. I just find it annoying when people make the same arguments against polygamy that others do against SSM, yet are for SSM. It's hypocritical.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Okay... maybe you two are a little slow.

I'm not against SSM, in fact I completely support it. I completely support polygamy as well because I'm not a hypocrite. I just find it annoying when people make the same arguments against polygamy that others do against SSM, yet are for SSM. It's hypocritical.

Dude...I'm for polygamy as well...assuming all parties are consenting.

 

[ben236]

Dude...I'm for polygamy as well...assuming all parties are consenting.

I never said you weren't.

 

[Jukai]

Traditional Marriage: A) Two people B) Different genders

Gay Marriage: A) Two people b) Same genders

Polygamous Marriage: a) More than two people B) Different genders

The relationship is clear and unequivocal. GM shares "A" with TM. PM shares "B".

You are making the claim that traditional marriage's number (two) is somehow more sacrosanct, and should be given greater weight and protection, than its gender relationship (male/female). On what are you basing this claim?

I'm basing it on literally all the links I have posted that you have thrown away as irrelevant for no real reason.

I'm just gonna ignore you from here on out in this thread, this is downright pathetic.

 

[Just a username]

Dude...I'm for polygamy as well...assuming all parties are consenting.

Nothing to do with the thread topic really, but your av reminded me of it:

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/04/27/robert-carlyle-my-trainspotting-character-was-gay/

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Nothing to do with the thread topic really, but your av reminded me of it:

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2009/04/27/robert-carlyle-my-trainspotting-character-was-gay/

I've heard this theory as well...

I just didn't see that...yeah he was agro, and he flipped out when he found out that woman in the car he was making out with was a dude...but I didn't see anything else that would indicate that he was gay..

I Mean, the argument that Axel Foley from Beverly Hills Cop was gay is a lot more compelling.

 

[Just a username]

I've heard this theory as well...

I just didn't see that...yeah he was agro, and he flipped out when he found out that woman in the car he was making out with was a dude...but I didn't see anything else that would indicate that he was gay..

I Mean, the argument that Axel Foley from Beverly Hills Cop was gay is a lot more compelling.

Well, Irvine Welsh hinted it in the book as well. It's an interesting theory though, how the super macho man is actually a closeted homosexual. I hear that there could possibly be a sequel, with the original cast, in 2016. That would be awesome.

Never heard the one about Axel Foley, gonna have to check it out.

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Well, Irvine Welsh hinted it in the book as well. It's an interesting theory though, how the super macho man is actually a closeted homosexual. I hear that there could possibly be a sequel, with the original cast, in 2016. That would be awesome.

Never heard the one about Axel Foley, gonna have to check it out.

1)There is one scene where Axel acts like a flaming homosexual to get entry into the gentleman's club...

2) Damon Wayans, (in a very gay cameo role) gives Axel free bananas, like there was a mutual understanding...

3) That scene with Serg in the art gallery talking about how unsexy revealing chest hair is.

4) His blonde friend, was just lying on his hotel bed, and Axel doesn't make a move...

however...

what convinced me was one particularly akward scene, which never sat right with me.

It's when his ole friend, Michael Tandino visits him in Detroit, and they are having drinks...and Axel asks him why he took the rap for him back in the day...

And Michael replies, "...you don't know?.......Its because....I love you."

 

[Gandhi]

How do you get him saying this? I thought he was just saying marriage is not a right.

Then he should have said that marriage is not a fundemental right rather than SSM

 

[Strychnine]

Or maybe it can be a perfect example of how the public needs to relax and stop acting like collective morons.

You can't just spout out whatever your opinion is when you're a CEO and not think you won't be held responsible by the shareholders either.

Because he came across like this guy and got smacked down.

Revenue (and the potential loss or gains thereof) is greater than any CEO.

 

[Just a username]

1)There is one scene where Axel acts like a flaming homosexual to get entry into the gentleman's club...

2) Damon Wayans, (in a very gay cameo role) gives Axel free bananas, like there was a mutual understanding...

3) That scene with Serg in the art gallery talking about how unsexy revealing chest hair is.

4) His blonde friend, was just lying on his hotel bed, and Axel doesn't make a move...

however...

what convinced me was one particularly akward scene, which never sat right with me.

It's when his ole friend, Michael Tandino visits him in Detroit, and they are having drinks...and Axel asks him why he took the rap for him back in the day...

And Michael replies, "...you don't know?.......Its because....I love you."

Lol, i've seen the movies multiple times and the thought never occured to me. Now that you put it that way...

 

[Gandhi]

1)There is one scene where Axel acts like a flaming homosexual to get entry into the gentleman's club...

2) Damon Wayans, (in a very gay cameo role) gives Axel free bananas, like there was a mutual understanding...

3) That scene with Serg in the art gallery talking about how unsexy revealing chest hair is.

4) His blonde friend, was just lying on his hotel bed, and Axel doesn't make a move...

however...

what convinced me was one particularly akward scene, which never sat right with me.

It's when his ole friend, Michael Tandino visits him in Detroit, and they are having drinks...and Axel asks him why he took the rap for him back in the day...

And Michael replies, "...you don't know?.......Its because....I love you."

Are we talking about Beverley's hills cop lol

 

[Social Distance Warrior]

Are we talking about Beverley's hills cop lol

Lmao! Try and keep up!

And yes...we are talking about Axel Foley being gay.

 

[James Keith]

Then he should have said that marriage is not a fundemental right rather than SSM

He did say something to that effect already, multiple posts ago. That is what I was referring to.

 

[Gandhi]

He did say something to that effect already, multiple posts ago. That is what I was referring to.

More CBK contradiction thanks for pointing it out.

 

[Gandhi]

Lmao! Try and keep up!

And yes...we are talking about Axel Foley being gay.

Who else is on your wish list?

 

[James Keith]

More CBK contradiction thanks for pointing it out.

heads I win tails you lose eh?