#MoreThanARefugee

Status
Not open for further replies.
Progress is something else isn't it?

I've asked you to clarify your question and you continue to make the situation seem black and white. I've asked you what the question has to do with the youtube video you posted and you don't seem to keen on answering.

You also tagged me because you assume you know my opinion on the matter anyway, which you don't.

Also, the answer to my question was 3, or 50%. Europe, America and Scandinavia aren't countries. Go start your daily pointless circular argument with someone else.

It's pretty clear what the question has to do with the refugee crisis.

No shit. I'm not going to list every country in Europe and Scandinavia. But I will next time just for you. Now that we got that out of the way want to answer the question?
 
Progress is something else isn't it?



It's pretty clear what the question has to do with the refugee crisis.

No shit. I'm not going to list every country in Europe and Scandinavia. But I will next time just for you. Now that we got that out of the way want to answer the question?

No, and I never thought that. What made you think any different?
 
Youtube has clear as day sided with the left. Not only do they keep pushing left wing propaganda but all of their 'trending' video are left wing propaganda as well.
 
Africa is projected to add a billion or so people in the next 50 years. I'm sure that won't lead to mass refugee crises. It will never stop.
 
yes-they need help but why cant they help themselves? outside of the sick, lame, women and children, they should be rising up and fighting for their cause. instead, the majority leave their women and children behind, and try to immigrate. is this the type of people you want immigrating to your country? cowards?

once they immigrate, they never go back. their country is forever screwed and they take with them the bad customs and traditions that made their country troublesome in the first place

I've never seen this question answered and makes the refugee system seem very bad in the long run

The argument for refugees is that there are "bad guys" (who are monsters) terrorizing "good guys" (who are just like us and born into a bad situation). The plan is to open the gates to let the good guys in until things "settle down" and we usually argue about how there's no way of screening the bad guys.

But even if we had a 100% effective vetting process, what is the long term plan here? What would happen to the countries where we take away everyone who isn't a raging homicidal maniac? What will happen to the countries where we take away all their future doctors, engineers and entrepreneurs? Do we just forsake the future of these countries and every generation take away anyone who isn't a monster?

Who is supposed to take these countries back from the "bad guys" and who is supposed to rebuild it?
 
Putin has created a powerful network of useful idiots.
The term useful idiots is used to describe ignorant enablers of a particular movement. In other words, that phrase doesn't work when describing folks who are against those enablers. You're welcome.
 
just gave the vid a thumbs down. hope the trend continues and youtube takes it down
 
The term useful idiots is used to describe ignorant enablers of a particular movement. In other words, that phrase doesn't work when describing folks who are against those enablers. You're welcome.

<TrumpWrong1>

You dummies get your marching orders from anon posts on 4chan then copy paste it all over the place like it's truth.
 
I'm still trying to figure out why they don't just ignore the ships in the Mediterranean, ostensibly letting them drown....

I mean does the USCG rescue Cuban refugees trying to get here? No, they don't, they actively try to deter the boats and pepper spray cats, anything to prevent them from touching the shore.....
 
<TrumpWrong1>

You dummies get your marching orders from anon posts on 4chan then copy paste it all over the place like it's truth.
Never been on 4chan and I don't subscribe to any ideology or rigid way of thinking. Got anything else Mr Irony?
 
Sad, that palestinian guy was thrown out of his home by the USA's "greatest ally". Now Europe will have to make a home for him, thanks guys.
 
No the situation right now is not better.

Why it doesn't work?
Where to start? First of all, what is the international community who is part of it? That would strongly influence everything right from the start.
Who is going to pay what? That heavily depend on each countries national politics.
What countries are considered ravaged by war? Who makes that call?
How do you aquire land? You would have declare war and official invade a country to get the land to build save zones.
That is just the political side.
If you build a big nice safe zone for ISIS to attack I don't think it will be a safe zone at all.

well I'm glad we can agree on that.

I would say, The US, European countries, Scandinavian countries (happy Gaz?), and a few others.

How much has been spent already on this refugee crisis? There's plenty willing to pay obviously.

Any country with refugees.

Lol the US invades any country it wants. This is the kind of invasion people would support. Also the country might even allow it.

There is a reason why I said they would be heavily guarded and have air support. Any military force that gets too close gets wrecked.
 
Last edited:
lol they're deleting comments now


ExceIsior _11 minutes ago (edited)
You deleted a comment i spent an hour typing and was just discussion of what my experiences were from working at a refugee shelter in Bremen, Germany. Why?




Empire of Trust10 minutes ago
Stop deleting comments, It's time for you to realize that the world isn't a bubble that agrees with your suicidal politics.
 
But even if we had a 100% effective vetting process, what is the long term plan here? What would happen to the countries where we take away everyone who isn't a raging homicidal maniac? What will happen to the countries where we take away all their future doctors, engineers and entrepreneurs? Do we just forsake the future of these countries and every generation take away anyone who isn't a monster?

Who is supposed to take these countries back from the "bad guys" and who is supposed to rebuild it?

this is why i'm against our immigration system. people come here and it becomes permanent, and its a shame because many of them have talents and resourcefulness that we are benefiting from. their country needs those talents and resourcefulness more than we do.

look at india and our H1B visa program; we get many talented programmers and engineers, draining their country of talent, keeping their country a shit hole.

as for those in war torn areas, i have pity for them but that's all they are going to get from me. when you get hundreds of thousands of men fleeing from the conflict, it all the more makes it easier for the enemy to take the country. if they all stood together and resisted/fought, they would have a chance of winning their country back.
 
I literally just did. "No" is the answer. What made you think any different was my follow up question.

So you don't think the international community should build safe zones with decent housing facilities in countries ravaged by war. Even with heavily armed guards with air support and all of that.

Gotcha.

What do you think is a better solution? Or do you think what's happening now is just fine?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top