• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

More complete champion, Israel or Islam?

1. Islam is a well rounded fighter who can win against another well rounded fighter, a top wrestler or a top striker.
Israel is lucky that MW's best wrestler is Vettori, a guy with not much skill.

2. When it comes to entertainment, Islam brings it... even on the ground where he goes for submissions.
Israel had very boring fights vs Cannonier and Israel.

3. Some may claim that Volk vs Islam was close, but I would say Rob vs Israel 2 was even closer



Izzy had 3 title losses.
Islam has 0 title losses.
Clearly a few dick riders for izzy in here arguing black is white when debating who is more complete or well rounded (not who has the best resume). But not even I think you meant Israel had a boring fight with Israel? ;)
 
I mean when you have 11 title fights you're bound to fight some bums like Kelvin and Melvin. It's not Izzy made a career choice to pick specific opponents like Issy did and also made them fight short notice too. I can't make this up!
"I can't make this up". And yet you did.
 
As far as the "complete" lack of personal appeal either fighter holds for me, I would have to call it a draw.

Completely weird and off-putting first names, also a draw.

As far as who is the more well-rounded actual fighter... LOL. Of course Makhachev.
So a victory for Islam then. No draw.
 
Islam is a better MMA fighter and has more impressive wins.
 
Islam displayed high level skill in striking, wrestling, and submissions

Adesanya was elite in the striking but not in other areas so Islam is def higher P4P and the more complete champion
Only one of Islam's defense was against an actual lightweight... the other two were against Volk where he went life and death the first time and KO'd a Volk getting off his couch on a week's notice after eating wagyu steaks and beers.
Volk is better than anyone Jizzy fough
 
Izzy cleaned out his division.. Izzy for now
not how completeness is gauged.

I'm not particuarly a fan of islam but i would say I'm an Izzy Supporter. He's a guy who did everything right as a champion and deserves nothing other than celebration and praise.

But no, Izzy's MMA game is far less complete than Islam's. MW is a very different Landscape and Lacks well rounded fighters. The most well rounded MW IMO, Is Dricus or Allen.
 
Izzy sucks MMA above WW is terrible

can't box or wrestle for shit
 
Yeah, Volk sucks, Oliveira too, they're nothing like Gastelum who Izzy went life and death with, or the legendary Vettori
Oliveira has lost plenty of times though, He's also been submitted multiple times. Even in Many of Charles wins of his best run he face much adversity. Volk while a great fighter is not a LW and when prepared, gave islam everything he could handle.

not sure why you brought up vettori, as Izzy beat him with the utmost ease, twice. Izzy Still beat Costa when he was undefeated, Whittaker never lost at MW before losing to Izzy twice, Izzy's competition is much much better than Islams.

not saying anyone sucks, but no need to detract from izzy to make Islam look better.
 
Oliveira has lost plenty of times though, He's also been submitted multiple times. Even in Many of Charles wins of his best run he face much adversity. Volk while a great fighter is not a LW and when prepared, gave islam everything he could handle.

not sure why you brought up vettori, as Izzy beat him with the utmost ease, twice. Izzy Still beat Costa when he was undefeated, Whittaker never lost at MW before losing to Izzy twice, Izzy's competition is much much better than Islams.

not saying anyone sucks, but no need to detract from izzy to make Islam look better.
Robert is his only quality win, Costa never was elite and never was on Volk's level as a fighter, or Oliveira, or Poirier
 
Islam would smoke izzy in hypothetical same weight match.
Islam had a competitive fight against someone who I think has similar ground skills and lesser striking skills in Portier when compared to Izzy.

I don't think it's a given Islam beats Izzy at the same weight. You can argue Izzy is a better Portier.
 
not how completeness is gauged.

I'm not particuarly a fan of islam but i would say I'm an Izzy Supporter. He's a guy who did everything right as a champion and deserves nothing other than celebration and praise.
The hate that Izzy got as a fighter was so stupid. Im not one to say people have to love a fighter outside the cage, but in the cage the guy was everything you need in a Champ: active, taking on all challengers, took a loss and came back to win it, skilled striker, and he had popular appeal at least online and I think he was slowly breaking into the mainstream as well.
 
Islam is more well-rounded, so I guess that means more complete. However, the most "complete" fighters aren't always the best. There are fighters who were/are more well-rounded than Khabib or Anderson Silva but didn't accomplish as much--nor could they have beaten all of the same opponents.

We concur.

Being a "complete" fighter is no guarantee of success.

As you point out, I think the very best fighters are specialists in something, then "rounded."

Islam is a grappling specialist, Izzy a striking specialist.

If they were the same weight class, I would favor Izzy, because I don't think Islam is as great a grappler as Khabib, and I think prime Izzy would keep it standing and outstrike him.

Leon Edwards will decimate Islam on the feet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mkt
Back
Top