• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

More complete champion, Israel or Islam?

Yeah, Volk sucks, Oliveira too, they're nothing like Gastelum who Izzy went life and death with, or the legendary Vettori
I mean when you have 11 title fights you're bound to fight some bums like Kelvin and Melvin. It's not Izzy made a career choice to pick specific opponents like Issy did and also made them fight short notice too. I can't make this up!
 
I feel like the title of this thread could be asked in the Middle East daily
 
As far as the "complete" lack of personal appeal either fighter holds for me, I would have to call it a draw.

Completely weird and off-putting first names, also a draw.

As far as who is the more well-rounded actual fighter... LOL. Of course Makhachev.
 
Only one of Islam's defense was against an actual lightweight... the other two were against Volk where he went life and death the first time and KO'd a Volk getting off his couch on a week's notice after eating wagyu steaks and beers.

That featherweight was the pound-for-pound number one fighter in the world and did much better than the number one ranked lightweight at the time, Oliveira. Volkanovski not being a ranked lightweight is irrelevant, considering he's still a ridiculously good fighter at lightweight. It's insanely dumb to discredit that win.
 
This thread was a brilliant way to prove that no matter what the question is people will regurgitate what the # of title defenses for absolutely no reason.

TS asks who is more well-rounded / which no one on Earth could legitimately even attempt to argue... but people still respond citing the utterly unrelated stat of # of title defenses as if that determined the answer lol.

Someone could make a thread asking who has a lighter complexion between the two and somehow there'd be Sherdoggers posting "well Israel had more title defenses so..."
 
Only one of Islam's defense was against an actual lightweight... the other two were against Volk where he went life and death the first time and KO'd a Volk getting off his couch on a week's notice after eating wagyu steaks and beers.

This argument isn't great, as if Volk wouldn't beat most of the lightweights in the Top 10. Do people think that an actual LW contender like Gaethje would be a better win than Volk? Especially after he got dogwalked by Holloway who Volk beat three times?

The first Volk fight is a great win, the second not so much. But I give the first fight as much weight as the Poirier win if not more.
 
Israel has nukes but there's way more Islam and it has Israel surrounded... so it's hard to say
The crazy thing is, Israel has both the ref, the commission, and the president of the promotion on his side. To the point that every few moments during the fight, the ref hands Israel a bat to use.
 
Now that they’ve had quite a few defenses
Who do you think is the more complete fighter?
Who do you think is more opposing to fight against?
For as dominant as Izzy was against some fighters, he clearly has holes in his game. Islam does not.

There is only one correct answer as to who is the more complete fighter. If you answer anything other than Islam, you are retarded.
 
As an all round fighter there is no question that is Islam (obviously).
 
Islam is obviously more complete. Maybe the most we've ever seen.

More opposing/scary is definitely Izzy. People joke but that dude is insanely talented and can put people's lights out in a heartbeat if they slip. Izzy himself said and I do think it's cope for his boring championship style, that if people don't provoke him he doesn't go for their heads. So in this case it does seem true that if you don't poke the bear he will only poke you enough to win on the cards. He isn't the only one (Leon).
Na, Islam is clearly far scarier than Izzy.

There is no obvious path to beating Islam.

There are many to beating Izzy; Strickland, Poatan, Polish Power all won in different ways.
 
Islam is obviously more complete. Maybe the most we've ever seen.

More opposing/scary is definitely Izzy. People joke but that dude is insanely talented and can put people's lights out in a heartbeat if they slip. Izzy himself said and I do think it's cope for his boring championship style, that if people don't provoke him he doesn't go for their heads. So in this case it does seem true that if you don't poke the bear he will only poke you enough to win on the cards. He isn't the only one (Leon).
In fact your last paragraph is a complete oxymoron

Izzy is scarier because he goes light on people. Complete opposite of scary
 
Izzy cleaned out his division.. Izzy for now
You aren't answering the question

Izzy has by far the better title run, resume, however you wish to compare careers.

Islam is a very well rounded fighter. Izzy has no offensive grappling and defensive grappling that can be exposed. Izzy will dominate the vast majority at his weight through superior height, reach, timing and striking. He is so far ahead of most here that it negates their strengths that could hurt him or shields his weaknesses. But he does have some pretty apparent flaws that several fighters have exposed.

Nobody has beaten this fully matured version of Islam and no one really looks capable.
 
Back
Top