1. Where did your likes go? Please Read This Thread »

MMA's Welterweights: UFC vs "The Others"

Discussion in 'UFC Discussion' started by SuperBadAzz, May 28, 2014.

  1. SuperBadAzz Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,650
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Arkansas
    As we know, worldwide MMA is a frowned upon discussion in these parts, so I figured I'd correlate the talent of other organizations vs the UFC..

    If all other organizations joined together, they could make for a very solid top 10.. Lets compare.

    The UFC's top 10 WW's are (& I know it's debatable):

    Hendricks
    Lawler
    Lombard
    Woodley
    MacDonald
    Brown
    Condit
    Kim
    Ellenberger
    Saffeidine

    Compare that to the top 10 best of the rest:

    Askren
    Shields
    Lima
    Palhares
    Koreshkov
    Burkman
    Fitch
    Hawn
    Carl
    McDonough

    That's not a bad list.. Sure the UFC looks better on paper, but head to head I think you've got some tough challenges..

    So my question is.. What record (10-0, 0-10, 5-5, etc.) would the UFC go in this situation?:

    Askren vs Hendricks

    Shields vs Lawler

    Lima vs Lombard

    Palhares vs Woodley

    Koreshkov vs MacDonald

    Burkman vs Brown

    Fitch vs Condit

    Hawn vs Kim

    Carl vs Ellenberger

    McDonough vs Saffeidine

    Is 5-5 for "The Others" outside the realm of possibility? I'd say absolutely not..
     
  2. OldManGrip Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    4,189
    Likes Received:
    0
    palhares is a killer, He looked great at ww against a true tough out. He could sub anyone on any given day. Too bad he has mental issues
     
  3. manapua Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,842
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    kansas
    Ufc 10-0
     
  4. SimonNova Worship and forget

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2012
    Messages:
    25,932
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Qc City
    ufc by murder
     
  5. PRIDEWASBETTER Whatever it takes Staff Member Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Messages:
    28,470
    Likes Received:
    50
    Location:
    United States of America
    9-1/8-2 UFC, imo
     
  6. Steve08 American Fedor Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    20,200
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    Agree.
    I think it is. But the WW outside of UFC is pretty solid for sure. Really puts into perspective how ridiculous the statements of "185-265" are the best divisions when there's barely any good fighters outside the UFC except Okami and Khalidov.
     
  7. PierreDrillin Orange Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2014
    Messages:
    255
    Likes Received:
    0
  8. O H Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2012
    Messages:
    1,853
    Likes Received:
    0
    I believe Lima beats a lot of guys in the UFC top 10
     
  9. UniqueSteez Be water my friend. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2013
    Messages:
    5,043
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    The Gym.
    Askren Vs Lombard.
     
  10. londonzizou93 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,692
    Likes Received:
    25
    Fitch, palhares, askren and shields would all beat most half of the most of ufc welterweight division
     
  11. SocraticMethod Kingmaker

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    24,970
    Likes Received:
    902
    Location:
    Over here now
    I'd say 8-2 or 7-3 in that situation. I'd have Hendricks over Askren, but I'm not sure how many (if any) other guys on the UFC side I'd pick over Askren.

    Who says that? Seems to me like WW and LW have been overwhelmingly considered the best/deepest divisions for years. LHW gets some props, but MW and HW are overwhelmingly considered the weakest weight classes.
     
  12. Steve08 American Fedor Belt

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    20,200
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    Off his back? nah
    I mean, I couldn't name any specific examples right now, but as I read the heavies and browse FB, etc. I've just seen some truly inane comments from people about how 185 or 205 are the most stacked, which basically all just boils down to people assuming that a weight class being top heavy means that it's brimming with legitimate title contenders when in fact the opposite is true.

    Just going by the media aggregate rankings on the UFC website, you have a guy like Feijao who will never sniff the title ranked #12, and you have a 43 year old right hand and a chin at #7 plus three middleweights in Sonnen, Belfort and Te-Huna also adding imaginary depth.

    It gets really funny when people claim that HWs are the best fighters, because they could beat every other weight class in a street fight :icon_lol:
     
  13. welcometohavoc Yellow Card Yellow Card

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2007
    Messages:
    19,141
    Likes Received:
    229
    Location:
    Maryland
    I say 7-3 UFC
     
  14. Arkridge Senior Moderator Senior Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2010
    Messages:
    21,902
    Likes Received:
    144
    Location:
    San Jose
    I want to see Lima vs. Condit really badly.
     
  15. SocraticMethod Kingmaker

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2008
    Messages:
    24,970
    Likes Received:
    902
    Location:
    Over here now
    Oh, OK. Fair enough.
     
  16. fortheo Steel Belt

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    33,272
    Likes Received:
    832
    Shields already beat like four of the ufc's top ten.
     
  17. Sosua Yeah nah

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    10,307
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Nouvelle Zealande
    Anything is possible but more than likely the B team all get finished.

    The best of them are on the real downside of their careers (Shields, Fitch)and Askren would get fucked up by Hendricks quick-smart.
     
  18. Sosua Yeah nah

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2011
    Messages:
    10,307
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Nouvelle Zealande
    A long ass time ago - as far as i'm aware, this isn't a prime vs prime debate.
     
  19. SuperBadAzz Brown Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2009
    Messages:
    3,650
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Shields is no worse now than he was then.. Granted the guys he's beaten have improved. Shields was cut because he wasn't entertaining. His status as an elite fighter isnt in question. He still beats the bulk of UFC WWs. Honestly, Lombard & Hendricks are the only top 10 WWs I'd pick to beat him.
     
  20. jko1355 Purple Belt

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I don't mean to be a hater but I think its 10 to 0... i think it would be closer if you did it playoff style


    number 1 vs number 10 of the other bracket and so on so..


    1. Hendricks vs Mcdonogh - Hendricks wins with ease

    2. Lawler vs Carl - Lawler wins

    3. Lombard vs Hawn - Lombard

    4. Woodley vs Fitch- I think Woodley wins today but in primes I think Fitch could Sheilds Woodley

    5. Macdonald vs Burkman - easily donald.

    6. Brown vs Koreshkov- good fight... either it looks like brown vs silva or brown gets tkoed early... probably Brown

    7. Condit vs Palhartes - I know I will get hate here but i think Palhares wins.. if he doesn't lose his mind he takes down condit and dominates... people forget how good Palhares takedowns are.

    8. Kim vs Lima - Judo Kim wins berserker Kim might lose so idk... this is probably a pickem

    9. Ellenburger vs Sheilds- we already saw this fight.. i know excuses... um probably a pickem again.

    10. Asken vs Safeidine- Askren wins this the same he beat every other striker... Safeidine also lost to Woodley who lay and prayed him and is a much worse wrestler...

    so then its... 5-2-3? the 3 being who knows?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.