- Joined
- Jan 14, 2006
- Messages
- 27,663
- Reaction score
- 7,839
That's what sucks about Pancrase. Sometimes I don't want to include any those fights because A) you don't know how many were works, and B) it has such unusual rules that it's damn near a different sport. It certainly muddies the waters though.
There were very few works, and they all occurred in the first couple of years when they were still close to their pro-wrestling origins. Ken's second loss to Suzuki was a work, his first loss to Funaki was a work, and his win over Matt Hume was a work. Funaki/Suzuki was also a work. That's it. As for the rules, that doesn't matter to me since a lot of orgs had different rules early on. Not to mention it doesn't make sense to complain about Pancrase but argue that Bas should rank higher than Ken despite Ken beating him twice, including the year you think he should rank higher than Ken.
One time I looked up the weights of everybody Ken fought in Pancrase and the vast majority of them were way smaller than him, which makes his Pancrase wins less impressive even if they were legit.
You're greatly exaggerating this, not to mention it also makes no sense why Ken would have a mark against him for being 220 pounds but Severn at 260 is cool in your book suplexing poor Anthony Macias who was giving up a hundred pounds. From 1993-1996, Ken pretty much stayed around 220 pounds. He leaned down to 205 against Royce at UFC 5 specifically to mitigate the whining about weight that he knew would inevitably follow and then he bulked up to 225 to lock horns with Severn at UFC 6 who he knew was way bigger than him. Throughout 1993-1996, he was regularly fighting guys his size or bigger. He only had 10-20 pounds on Funaki, Yoshiki Takahashi, Manabu Yamada, Bas, Leon Dijk, and Christophe Leininger; he was around the same size as Pat Smith, Maurice Smith, Felix Mitchell, and Brian Johnston; and he was smaller than Andre Van Den Oetelaar, Ryushi Yanagisawa, Severn, and Kimo.