- Joined
- Dec 25, 2016
- Messages
- 3,486
- Reaction score
- 1
The thing is people actually believe that if you read twitter or other forums. I have routinely seen people say he's better than Harper or Trout. I agree the small sample is insane and he is no doubt the front runner for mvp but there are numerous people that actually believe the statement.
Also Bellinger has the best hr rate to start a career and he's much younger than judge. I do think Judge is much better and I expect Bellinger to fall closer to Pederson than the former.
There's people on twitter and on THIS forum who think the earth is flat. Dumb people are everywhere online. That shouldn't count as a point against anything he's done so far.
There's a reason you couldn't name a rookie from the last 35 years with the same resume... there isn't one.
I don't know hasn't played a full season yet and the HR derby notoriously screws up a guys swing the 1st couple of weeks after the break.
He'll be fine, even @Revolver knows it. That's why he didn't wanna tell us if he's got the over or.the under at 50.
lmao at Judge having "earned" the right to be called the next ruth because he's had a great 85 games lmfao
You're right. It was clear 75 games in he was better than Ruth. I'm gonna call him Aaron "More than Ruth" Judge from now on, just for you.
So Judge's number are better now than they were in the minors? Yea, this isn't going to last.
If it does can you come back here, quote yourself and say "hey everyone look how wrong I was!"....? That'd show some confidence.