Discussion in 'The Lightweights' started by INoHespectChael, Feb 8, 2016.
That last line.
She has a pretty detailed history about losing to champs that's for sure.
Quality not quantity TS.
You'll figure it out one day
I saw that and thought exactly the same, she's prepping because she knows she will get outclassed by the phenom that is Holly Holm. Holm will send her into retirement.
She's hunky. I like her.
Holly is going to beat her.
Holm...then Nunes...then Schevchenko(?) That would equal three losses in a row.
This might actually be the first death in UFC. Just watched Julie Kedzie vs Tate and Holm is basically a far better version of Julie this is gonna be ugly. Holly gonna beat that big ass down.
All I had seen at first was "Miesha Tate about to take 3..., Well needless to say it wasn't "losses" that came to mind
she was definitely getting her head kicked in but we can't just ignore miesha is tough as nails and managed to pull off a finish and won that fight. she has been through some wars and know what it's like to go up against a great kickboxer so i think she has a better shot than people are giving her credit for.
Do you guys think its going to be decision or finish?
50/50 but probably leaning towards finish.
Taking that kind of damage against Holm would be deadly. Tate's improved a lot since then but it feels a precursor to this fight. Just don't think her striking is up to par to have a competitive fight with Holly. See her eating a lot of strikes.
Kedzie is also the same size as Tate, while Holly is the upper echelon of BW.
And Holly's legs, dear lord.
Well its an mma forum not a porn site you freak
Miesha submitted Marloes and got submitted by Ronda (who was only the champ in the 2nd fight). She also has beaten a champ in the FCF. I am not sure how that's a detailed history.
and why is the NFL being mentioned in a MMA forum?
You butt hurt that Tate got slapped by Rousey twice?
Separate names with a comma.