- Joined
- Sep 18, 2013
- Messages
- 61,838
- Reaction score
- 42,450
Starr never should have been looking into President Clinton's sexual life or the firing of the Travel Office staff. President Clinton was dragged through the mud because of prosecutorial overreach. It was completely unnecessary and a waste of resources.
It's not a linguistic argument. The current wording allows Mueller's team to look into literally anything that might interest them. If Mueller were to make a hard swerve into Pizzagate and Jade Helm territory, something tells me you wouldn't be arguing that side. The current purview of the Mueller probe is unlimited. Civil liberties be damned.
How unfortunate that you support a President that can't stand the test of probe with an unlimited scope.
It's like you're upset that they're going to find his crimes.
Wouldn't you prefer a President without a criminal past?