#MeToo costing models jobs

[GergreG]

It's only a matter of time before all female TV presenters/personalities are fat, ugly and unhappy.

 

[Phlog]

--No. Society is better off w/o shit kids

--The 40% thing is huge. I agree that women will get in line to be a mistress to the alpha instead of marry/ a beta, 80/20 dating, etc but 40% is huge especially since marriage wasn't about love for most of history. I just ran across this about WWII "The population of Germany took a major hit. 46% of the 1939 male population was either dead or seriously wounded. "
Yeah, there have been some beta dudes, gay dudes, etc, but 40% of the population is huge

You keep saying huge, what do you mean by that? The evidence is incontrovertible.

Most of our evolution has taken place in small groups of <150. In such groups having a decent size next gen is the difference between life or death during inter group competition.

 

[HelloJapan]

Image wont' show, but I'm assuming you're saying...

And my response is...

 

[bufetadanacara]

Uh no dude, that would be like if you went to a steakhouse where they used to have hot chicks in skimpy clothing and then they stopped having hot chicks in skimpy clothing while you were eating steak and set up an espresso bar instead.

Look, I like women ok? I especially appreciate the more attractive, less clothes ones. It's my choice and you don't have to agree with me.

You can like whomever you choose.

 

[HunterSdVa29]

if 'having kids' was winning today evolutionary sense....we wouldn't have so many single parent households

In fact one could argue w/ current population rates, making kids is hurting us, especially given the stronger societal pull towards stronger Social Welfare/Safety Net benefits

Having kids is only winning if you PAY for them as well, this isn't 1875 you can't put them to work in the field. That's a liability, not an asset

 

[LukeSkyrocker]

Model #1 tweets "I cannot get a modelling job."

Mode #2 replies "#metoo"

*Daniel Cormier laughing gif

 

[ralphc1]

How about super hot babes working the coffe bar?

Can't have good looking women.

 

[Ogata]

I can literally sense your writhing misogyny through the forum space.

From where are you drawing these erroneous bullshit facts? "Remain anonymous"? You actually believe that someone can be charged with rape by an anonymous victim without evidence? Do you consider yourself educated because you watch Fox News every day and listen to Bill O'Reilly?

Again like the typical sjw feminist, you are getting overly emotional. To answer your question, I first hand experienced a relative being taken away by the police. So no it' not a bill Riley fox thing it's something I witnessed first hand 7 years ago.

 

[Mr Mojo Lane]

You keep saying huge, what do you mean by that? The evidence is incontrovertible.

Most of our evolution has taken place in small groups of <150. In such groups having a decent size next gen is the difference between life or death during inter group competition.

No it's not. Someone might be able to quantify 40% (doubtful), but the reasons behind it no one really knows.

Here's another thing. If 10 guys have sex w/ a girl, only one of them actually impregnates her

 

[Ares Black]

With all this feminist BS, you really just have to go MGTOW and as a MGTOW you can hire these hot women for a good night since they need to make a living to and you need to relax.

Future is about direct transactions and gender segregation in work places.

This post is so pathetic.

 

[Uber_Noober]

Can't have good looking women.

 

[Phlog]

No it's not. Someone might be able to quantify 40% (doubtful), but the reasons behind it no one really knows.

Here's another thing. If 10 guys have sex w/ a girl, only one of them actually impregnates her

I meant the evidence of only 40 odd % of all males in history creating progeny is incontrovertible. Logic dictates the rest.

 

[Ogata]

This post is so pathetic.

Another person who resorts to insults as oppose to coming up with a rational rebuttal.

 

[Ares Black]

Another person who resorts to insults as oppose to coming up with a rational rebuttal.

No man, I just seriously feel sorry for you. Something bad must have happened to make you think this way.

 

[Mr Mojo Lane]

I meant the evidence of only 40 odd % of all males in history creating progeny is incontrovertible. Logic dictates the rest.

A.D Population easily trumps the B.C population, so the influence of caveman culture is not as impactful as you think. http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/other/worldpop.html

Even in caveman days, women would go to various males to gather more resources. This is one of the things that has happen with the breakdown of the family. Women are looking for an alpha more than a husband, but they will look to other men for additional resources also. That is primitive nature.

Where are you getting the 40% from?

 

[milkmandanl]

With all this feminist BS, you really just have to go MGTOW and as a MGTOW you can hire these hot women for a good night since they need to make a living to and you need to relax.

Future is about direct transactions and gender segregation in work places.

MGTOW?

Man Going To Own Women?

 

[Ares Black]

MGTOW?

Man Going To Own Women?

Men Grabbing Their Own Wangs

 

[milkmandanl]

Men Grabbing Their Own Wangs

Huh?

Never mind...just googled it...watched 34 seconds of a 12 minute MGTOW video...your definition appears to be accurate

 

[vik93]

Of course procreation is winning, procreating well and producing great successful kids is even more winninger. Evolution dictates this.

Raising shit kids being shit is only better than nothing.

The one guy having kids with many women is a dynamic born of getting the population back to a reasonable size after war or some such kills most guys. Groups doing that outcompete others. The best women, get the dedicated husband though and such lineages are more likely to rule, be rich etc.

The 40% number ain't skewed by such stuff, it is such stuff, it's also because of a lot of other shit and plenty of women will choose an absent but better quality father rather than the options they have for a less quality father that will stick around. That the disadvantage of having only one parent is off set by the aversion of genetic failure.

Men are more variable as a result of having less information in our chromosomes, as a result we both win and lose the genetic lottery more.

I have a cousin who has kids. Believes he's some big winner because he managed to have some unprotected sex and get a fat chick pregnant. He's a loser. You sound like him.

 

[Eazy123]

They have women, just ugly ones.

OMG SEXIST