Law Meta faces £1.8bn lawsuit over claims it inflamed violence in Ethiopia

LeonardoBjj

Professional Wrestler
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
9,789
Reaction score
12,419
Son of murdered academic calls on Facebook owner to ‘radically change how it moderates dangerous content’

Dan Milmo Global technology editor

Meta faces a $2.4bn (£1.8bn) lawsuit accusing the Facebook owner of inflaming violence in Ethiopia after the Kenyan high court said a legal case against the US tech group could go ahead.

The case brought by two Ethiopian nationals calls on Facebook to alter its algorithm to stop promoting hateful material and incitement to violence, as well as hiring more content moderators in Africa. It is also seeking a $2.4bn “restitution fund” for victims of hate and violence incited on Facebook.

One of the claimants is the son of Prof Meareg Amare Abrha, who was murdered at his home in Ethiopia after his address and threatening posts were published on Facebook in 2021 during a civil war in the country. Another claimant is Fisseha Tekle, a former researcher at Amnesty International who published reports on violence committed during the conflict in Tigray in northern Ethiopia and received death threats on Facebook.

Meta has argued that courts in Kenya, where Facebook’s Ethiopia moderators were based at the time, did not have jurisdiction over the case. The Kenyan high court in Nairobi ruled on Thursday that the case fell within the jurisdiction of the country’s courts.


Abrham Meareg, the son of Meareg, said: “I am grateful for the court’s decision today. It is disgraceful that Meta would argue that they should not be subject to the rule of law in Kenya. African lives matter.”

"Tekle said he cannot return home to Ethiopia because of Meta’s failure to make Facebook safe. “Meta cannot undo the damage it has done, but it can radically change how it moderates dangerous content across all its platforms to make sure no one else has to go through what I have,” he said. “I look forward to this matter now being heard by the court in full.”

The case, supported by non-profit organisations including Foxglove and Amnesty International, also demands a formal apology from Meta for the murder of Meareg. The Katiba Institute, a Kenya-based NGO focusing on the Kenyan constitution, is the third claimant in the case.

In 2022 an analysis by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism and the Observer found that Facebook was letting users post content inciting violence through hate and misinformation, despite being aware that it was fuelling tensions in Tigray.

Meta rejected the claims at the time, saying it had “invested in safety and security measures” to tackle hate and inflammatory language along with “aggressive steps to stop the spread of misinformation” in Ethiopia.

In January the company said it was removing factcheckers and “dramatically” reducing the amount of censorship on the platform, although it would continue to tackle illegal and high severity violations.

Meta said it did not comment on ongoing legal matters.

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...-over-claims-it-inflamed-violence-in-ethiopia
 
FB algorithm is designed to show people things that keep them engaged. It's not FB/meta's fault that hateful material drives engagement. If facebook didnt do it, somebody else would. That being said, fuck facebook.
 
Last edited:
And a Russian court fined Google for 2x10^36 Rubles, which is considerably more than the whole world's GDP.
Who gives a shit what some kangaroo court in some shit hole decided!
 
FB algorithm is designed to show people things that keep them engaged. It's not FB/meta's fault that hateful material drives engagement. If facebook didnt do it, somebody else would. That being said, fuck facebook.
That s a very grey area IMO. For example, I don t think that it s possible to post salafist garbage calling for murder in Europe on FB, and rightfully so. If it happened I would be in favour of Meta having to pay fines or more. So why should I tolerate hate speech and call for murder in civil war ridden shitholes?

Oh BTW „African lives matter“ is going to turn off many. I almost stopped reading. Not because African lives don‘t matter, but because of the after taste of piss and woke shit attached.
 
FB algorithm is designed to show people things that keep them engaged. It's not FB/meta's fault that hateful material drives engagement. If facebook didnt do it, somebody else would. That being said, fuck facebook.
Drug dealers sell people things that keep them engaged. It's not the dealer's fault that cocaine drives engagement. If dealers didnt do it, somebody else would.

/sarcasm
 
FB algorithm is designed to show people things that keep them engaged. It's not FB/meta's fault that hateful material drives engagement. If facebook didnt do it, somebody else would. That being said, fuck facebook.
- I do agree. When we had the raining here last year, the people celebrating the destruction of the south, did because they're scum, not meta fault
 
Drug dealers sell people things that keep them engaged. It's not the dealer's fault that cocaine drives engagement. If dealers didnt do it, somebody else would.

/sarcasm
so you are in favor of the war on drugs..
 
FB algorithm is designed to show people things that keep them engaged. It's not FB/meta's fault that hateful material drives engagement. If facebook didnt do it, somebody else would. That being said, fuck facebook.
It's entirely their fault.
 
no its not
Yes, it is.


"Former Meta employees have repeatedly pointed out that its algorithms do not understand the difference between falsehoods and truth. Rather than filtering out false information, these algorithms are engineered to maximise user engagement and prioritise content – harmful or otherwise – that triggers strong reactions. This issue is compounded by Meta’s failure to provide full transparency about its algorithmic design."




And Twitter is worse.

This page goes into great detail about how to exploit the algorithm.

And

These cunts know exactly what they're doing.
 
Yes, it is.


"Former Meta employees have repeatedly pointed out that its algorithms do not understand the difference between falsehoods and truth. Rather than filtering out false information, these algorithms are engineered to maximise user engagement and prioritise content – harmful or otherwise – that triggers strong reactions. This issue is compounded by Meta’s failure to provide full transparency about its algorithmic design."




And Twitter is worse.

This page goes into great detail about how to exploit the algorithm.

And

These cunts know exactly what they're doing.

meta is not responsible for the fact that humans are most likely to engage more with controversial/negative content. They take advantage of that trait but they are not the cause of it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top