Social Meme Thread v.84: Retaking Constantinople

Status
Not open for further replies.

witness-1.gif


4c1.gif
 
It’s sucks to see them go. Don’t call the site a groomers meet up. Don’t call mods groomers. Virtue signaling on Sherdog about how much you hate groomers isn’t going to stop the trans push on impressionable children under the guise of gay acceptance.
 
Lmao what did those two do
It’s sucks to see them go. Don’t call the site a groomers meet up. Don’t call mods groomers. Virtue signaling on Sherdog about how much you hate groomers isn’t going to stop the trans push on impressionable children under the guise of gay acceptance.
 
Vague. They made fun of sherdog and got banned? Don’t ban me I love this place

Banning communications are always vague on purpose, in a don’t speak I’ll of the dead type way.

They’d both recovered a dozen warnings and personal PMs from various mods to tone it back. They knew, and chose to go out like this.
 
It’s sucks to see them go. Don’t call the site a groomers meet up. Don’t call mods groomers. Virtue signaling on Sherdog about how much you hate groomers isn’t going to stop the trans push on impressionable children under the guise of gay acceptance.
Damn those two were good posters. I realize the anti anti groomer message here but damn. Soon to just neuter this entire site. Didn’t see your second post.

Curious, do you get warnings prior to bannings aside from carding?
 
Curious, do you get warnings prior to bannings aside from carding?

Yeah, we can give 0 point “formal” warnings that don’t result in a card but the poster still gets the PM about how their post broke the rules, and when posts are deleted there’s often a warning alert message we send.

Both posters got these multiple times due to their tenure spent here.
 
Coincidence new mods are extreme lefties?
<probably> But not a good look.

And @HockeyBjj you keep saying that being against...you know what <great place you've got here that I have to dance around the words, but that's the intent isn't it?!> is virtue signaling. Howzzat then?

Extreme lefties? Both the newest additions are what I’d see more as Bill Clinton era democrats.

Aren’t people saying Clinton Dems (minus the intern BJs) would be conservatives now?
 
@HockeyBjj, my last post being deleted is what makes people doubt the stated intentions behind that new rule, targeting certain words.

If the main issue was not wanting to show up in the search results when someone Googles a certain word, why would euphemisms be off the table? You worried about the euphemism I used (which only a handful of other posters would understand) randomly being searched by a bunch of random people and this site coming up at the top?

<YeahOKJen>

While you're (or whoever deleted my last post) just following the orders you're given, don't peddle that "uhh don't wanna end up in the search result" bullshit reason to us as if we're some retarded leftist who believes everything CNN tells him.
 
Yeah, we can give 0 point “formal” warnings that don’t result in a card but the poster still gets the PM about how their post broke the rules, and when posts are deleted there’s often a warning alert message we send.

Both posters got these multiple times due to their tenure spent here.
Still sucks. Wish we had a month temp ban option.
 
@HockeyBjj, my last post being deleted is what makes people doubt the stated intentions behind that new rule, targeting certain words.

If the main issue was not wanting to show up in the search results when someone Googles a certain word, why would euphemisms be off the table? You worried about the euphemism I used (which only a handful of other posters would understand) randomly being searched by a bunch of random people and this site coming up at the top?

<YeahOKJen>

While you're (or whoever deleted my last post) just following the orders you're given, don't peddle that "uhh don't wanna end up in the search result" bullshit reason to us as if we're some retarded leftist who believes everything CNN tells him.

Search result is indeed a legitimate concern. As for dinging code words and euphemisms, there’s a lot of political topics to discuss. The right being hyper focused on this one allows a lot of other issues to slip by.

If democrats were smart, they could use that hyper focus rage on social issues to slip past whatever actual socialist financial policies through and they’d be completely ignored so long as some stupid parent took a picture of her kid at some clown makeuped dude in a dress story time 24 hours before the vote

the above are my as a poster’s feelings, not necessarily moderator me’s thoughts on the matter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top