Social Meme Thread v.84: Retaking Constantinople

Status
Not open for further replies.
1657614948318.png


1658477626315-618x618.png


8-618x618.jpeg
 
No. I'm not posting the mod's name.

I've done a pretty shitty job of being cordial in my attempts to fully explain by absolute disgust about the situation.

Despite by rage, I'm actually NOT trying to get banned but if it happens so be it. This is worth standing for on two fronts.

*Banning the use of words required of a specific discussion is effectively banning that entire discussion... on the same day that Reddit & Twitter banned them.

(Which leads me to believe this was a top-down decision, and the mods are enforcing it, which doesn't absolve them but if I start calling them out be name all mutual respect by long-standing reputation will be lost.)

*Giving infractions to accounts based on rules that aren't posted publicly, and therefore not known, discussed, or properly understood. It'll set the president that any rule can be made at any to ban any words and discussions.

Anyone else 'member back in the late 2000s that 'Teabagger' was a common slur? Or in 2015 & 2016 'Cuck' was hurled in heated arguments?

I 'member. And no rule or was added for them.

But now a rule has been added at the same time Reddit and Twitter adds it, because the LGBTQ lobby wants to avoid all criticism by claiming the word 'Gr***er' is being used to deface all of them.

The real reason they hate being called gr***ers is.... because they're gr***ers, either directly, indirectly, or not publicly disavowing the gr***ers in their ranks.

But they won't do that 3rd option, obviously, because its far easier to censor those who rightfully point out they're gr***ers.
This. They are caving into the LGTQBS lobby they let everything else slide u til now basically
 
After referring to the Babylon Bee, here are more alternatives

6r00mer
Minorphile
Public School Teacher
Person of Grooming
--. .-. --- --- -- . .-. (morse code)
Roomer-Gay (Pig latin)
Gender Mentoring Advisor
Epsteinian
Child Abusist
Aunt Tifa
Windowless Van Aficionado
Genital Relocation Logistics Coordinator

<{outtahere}>
Person of grooming is best. We can just write POG and it works out
 
i just got home and i thought i was in a completely different thread and refreshed the page then all i seen was like 20 memes and i was right about to start requoting a bunch of them to call people stupid if all they have to say on the matter is to post a dumb little meme that really has nothing to do with the subject at hand. and then i realised i'm in the meme thread. yeah fuck me i would have made a total idiot of myself right here lol
 
i just got home and i thought i was in a completely different thread and refreshed the page then all i seen was like 20 memes and i was right about to start requoting a bunch of them to call people stupid if all they have to say on the matter is to post a dumb little meme that really has nothing to do with the subject at hand. and then i realised i'm in the meme thread. yeah fuck me i would have made a total idiot of myself right here lol
Again… :p
 
I was given the Google index explanation by a mod as well. Not one of the new shitty mods, a well respected mod who is also a quality dude.

We're just going to have to find work arounds of which there are already many.

Google supposedly obeys the directives in the robots.txt file.

The mods know this, or should. The forum administrators are in complete control over whether Google is allowed to index pages.

But then, they wouldn't earn GoogleBucks for clicks and impressions. The forum is just using the "Google index" excuse to control user behavior.

Introduction to robots.txt

You can use a robots.txt file for web pages (HTML, PDF, or other non-media formats that Google can read), to manage crawling traffic if you think your server will be overwhelmed by requests from Google's crawler, or to avoid crawling unimportant or similar pages on your site.

Warning: Don't use a robots.txt file as a means to hide your web pages from Google search results.

If other pages point to your page with descriptive text, Google could still index the URL without visiting the page. If you want to block your page from search results, use another method such as password protection or noindex.

If your web page is blocked with a robots.txt file, its URL can still appear in search results, but the search result will not have a description. Image files, video files, PDFs, and other non-HTML files will be excluded. If you see this search result for your page and want to fix it, remove the robots.txt entry blocking the page. If you want to hide the page completely from Search, use another method.
 
Google supposedly obeys the directives in the robots.txt file.

The mods know this, or should. The forum administrators are in complete control over whether Google is allowed to index pages.

But then, they wouldn't earn GoogleBucks for clicks and impressions. The forum is just using the "Google index" excuse to control user behavior.

Introduction to robots.txt
Even if we discount this, their reasoning is dumb. The excuse is they don't want to show up at the top of searches if someone Googles the g-word, but they have no problem if they show up at the top if someone Googles "racist", "Nazi", "homophobic", "bigot" and "transphobic" seeing as that's all the leftist posters spam when they don't have a rebuttal.
 
Even if we discount this, their reasoning is dumb. The excuse is they don't want to show up at the top of searches if someone Googles the g-word, but they have no problem if they show up at the top if someone Googles "racist", "Nazi", "homophobic", "bigot" and "transphobic" seeing as that's all the leftist posters spam when they don't have a rebuttal.

Yep. They use this strictly to control user behavior of those with whom they disagree because they don't really favor vigorous and open debate on this topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top