Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan - "terror attacks are part and parcel of life in a big city"

You guys don't understand or just choose to ignore the history of Britain if you believe his statement to be false. Historically there has always been terror attacks and threats in the UK by various groups. From the 'Gun-powder plot' in the 1600's to the real IRA attacks as recent as 2001. So i'm confused by the butt hurt? Right now the threat is from Islamic extremists. In maybe 10 years it will be from another group.

Not all major cities suffer from terrorist attacks, why should London?
 
Terror attacks are just another part of life in the Big City? Fuck this guy. Too bad the brits don't have guns, surely someone would kill that piece of shit.


Thinks more guns = less violence...........



Retard alert.
 
Not all major cities suffer from terrorist attacks, why should London?

Why should Belfast? Why should Birmingham? Aldershot, Manchester, Liverpool, Coventry, Bristol, Brighton...? The list goes on. All these cities and towns have suffered from terrorism, and not from muslims. I think you people dont understand how treacherous the IRA were/are. But then again that doesn't suit your agenda so its swept under the rug.
 
Or, terrorist attacks happen in the cities of countries that are constantly bombing the Middle East.

You mean like Nigeria, Kenya, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Cameroon etc etc... they're all bombing the middle-east, amirite?
 
Why should Belfast? Why should Birmingham? Aldershot, Manchester, Liverpool, Coventry, Bristol, Brighton...? The list goes on. All these cities and towns have suffered from terrorism, and not from muslims. I think you people dont understand how treacherous the IRA were/are. But then again that doesn't suit your agenda so its swept under the rug.

heres a question, brain child. why doesnt england deal with islam the way it dealt with the IRA?
 
The vast majority? So, if we look we won't find examples of terrorist attacks in NYC, Mexico City, Beijing, etc. that have nothing to do with Islam? We will.

Beijing had a Muslim terrorist attack a while back.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Tiananmen_Square_attack

But i'll be interested in you finding me examples of terrorist attacks in these cities that had nothing to do with Islam: Tokyo, Rio, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Caracas, Seoul, Budapest, Taipei... and any other big cities.

Anyway, even if you can find the odd one or two, it doesn't really mean anything because the cunt of London claimed it's part & parcel of ANY big city, which is OBVIOUSLY not true.

In the last 21 years Tokyo has had domestic terrorism but no Islamic terrorism. Now you might say one attack in 20 years proves you point but it also proves mine. They have muslims and mosques and they have terrorism...but they've never had muslim terrorism.

No, it doesn't prove your point. It certainly proves mine though. And the fact you'd even bring up the fact it happen 20+ years ago is proof you're well aware of your own desperation.

Every big city is a target for groups trying to make a political point with violence..and always has been.

So why aren't we seeing terrorist attacks all the time, in all big cities? LOL! You people are SO desperate to constantly defend Islam and play down the negative effect Islam has on civilization, you have no qualms about making yourself look like a moron on a regular basis. It's hilarious. Hahaha

If you're taking a short view on history and limiting it the last 20 years then Islamic based terrorism is the predominant form we're seeing. But if you're view on history is that short then it's not very complete either.

Islamic extremism/terrorism has existed for 1400 years - as long as Islam has existed for. A thousand years ago, had explosives existed, Muslims would've been blowing themselves up back then too. Please stop.

Someone else said it bluntly & plainly in this thread already: he's literally trying to get us to accept terrorism as normal. After the Nice attack (I think it was the Nice attack, I can't keep up with all the religion of peace attacks lately), the Prime Minister of France said that people 'just have to get used to terrorist attacks now'. That is where we're at in Western civilization today. Western leaders are actively trying to brainwash the people they're supposed to be protecting into accepting mass murder as 'the new norm'. It is pure evil.
 
Shouldn't have been said in the manner in which it was said, but it is a fact. You could have the most cohesive planet imaginable and you are still going to have dissenters.
 
You gotta be one hell of a cuck prime minister to allow your capital to get so minority loaded as to permit a fundie muzzie to become its Mayor.
 
I've lived in London for 34 years. Both of the bombs that went off within a 4 mile radius of my house were planted by the IRA. Sticking your head in the sand and acting stupid really isn't going to help anything.

Irrelevant. That's one single city. The cunt of London claimed terrorist attacks are part & parcel of ANY big city. So why aren't we seeing terrorist attacks all the time, in every big city? Please explain.

Also, the IRA would often phone ahead so as to avoid casualties. Their goal was to cause disruption, not mass slaughter. Muslim extremists try to kill AS MANY PEOPLE AS THEY POSSIBLY CAN.
 
imagine if a gun advocate says that...........
 
but he is right about one thing, you can't be divided when you try to fight an enemy.
 
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/worl...nd-parcel-of-life-in-a-big-city-a3347891.html

http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...ork-terror-attacks-normal-trump-scapegoating/



He also wouldn't use Trump's name when referring to him and said he wouldn't get involved in American politics then...



He also mentioned that London and New Yorks communites cannot become divided, despite the fact that the city he presides over is majority Non-White British and is the most divided it has ever been.

So there you have it folks, stop crying about terrorism, it's societies fault, not a certain religion/culture...

I sincerely hope Khan is the next victim of terrorism in London:rolleyes:
 
Irrelevant. That's one single city. The cunt of London claimed terrorist attacks are part & parcel of ANY big city. So why aren't we seeing terrorist attacks all the time, in every big city? Please explain.

Also, the IRA would often phone ahead so as to avoid casualties. Their goal was to cause disruption, not mass slaughter. Muslim extremists try to kill AS MANY PEOPLE AS THEY POSSIBLY CAN.

What? Are you actually trying to argue that the IRA is in some way more moral than the islamic extremists? A close family friend died in the Birmingham pub bombings. Tell that to his children and grandchildren. You people will try and rationalise ANYTHING just to suit your agenda. Delusional
 
heres a question, brain child. why doesnt england deal with islam the way it dealt with the IRA?

Brain child?..ok... Well I personally dont think you can treat 2 different threats in the same way. There are different factors as to why these groups exist. There is no "1 size fits all" solution. What I do believe is that there is not much they can do as many of these attacks by so called Islamic extremists are so random and unpredictable.
 
Brain child?..ok... Well I personally dont think you can treat 2 different threats in the same way. There are different factors as to why these groups exist. There is no "1 size fits all" solution. What I do believe is that there is not much they can do as many of these attacks by so called Islamic extremists are so random and unpredictable.

how convenient that you use a 1 size fits all comparison between islam and the IRA in your other post. i guess you can only compare the two when it works for you.
 
how convenient that you use a 1 size fits all comparison between islam and the IRA in your other post. i guess you can only compare the two when it works for you.

Haha not at all. You're clutching at straws here. I'm supprised you haven't criticised my grammar yet. There is no 1 size fits all solution to any kind of terrorism, so with each type of threat, each must be dealt with in a way that best suits the threat. The IRA and Islamic terrorism are the 2 prominent ones that I can think of in the UK so I used them to compare. My initial point was that the Mayor had a point because terrorism is not new to the UK. I dont see how any of what I have said contradicts this point and its my guess that you can't show how anything I have said contradicts this point either. Nice try though
 
Haha not at all. You're clutching at straws here. I'm supprised you haven't criticised my grammar yet. There is no 1 size fits all solution to any kind of terrorism, so with each type of threat, each must be dealt with in a way that best suits the threat. The IRA and Islamic terrorism are the 2 prominent ones that I can think of in the UK so I used them to compare. My initial point was that the Mayor had a point because terrorism is not new to the UK. I dont see how any of what I have said contradicts this point and its my guess that you can't show how anything I have said contradicts this point either. Nice try though

youre clutching at straws. you say there are terrorist attacks everywhere from the IRA. thats true. the british government then labeled them as terrorists. why arent we labeling islam as terrorists after their terrorist attacks?
 
Is normal. The guy is just going with the program.
 
I bet if his neighbor was stealing his stuff and he went to the cops, then the cop said stealing happens deal with it. He is like I know who is stealing, it's my neighbor, cops like sorry getting your stuff stolen is part of life now, Ole Mayor dude would be pissed. Now we are just telling people, sorry but Muslims gonna Muslim, so get used to it.
 
youre clutching at straws. you say there are terrorist attacks everywhere from the IRA. thats true. the british government then labeled them as terrorists. why arent we labeling islam as terrorists after their terrorist attacks?

They labelled IRA as terrorists, not all Irish people or all catholic or all protestant people but members of the organisation.
 
Back
Top