D
Deleted member 585708
Guest
I think in this country we're supposed to wait until something is proven.
What's that got to do with what I just said?
I think in this country we're supposed to wait until something is proven.
Adams sucks
I don't agree with that. He's been associating with shady characters for a while.His political career has been all down hill since calling out the migrant crisis
What do you mean?Yep. I think there is a huge imbalance on that issue, too.
Watch your tone. Not all of us are bad.
You know, it would be really for you to just be a man before being a Republican. You can still have your same views on philosophy and policy and generally vote Republican without feeling the need to defend corruption. It's easy for me to say that liberal policy produces good results, but if a Democratic politician turns out to be a sleaze (as Adams appears to be), they should face the consequences.Of course you do. It must be so difficult for you up there on your pedestal.
When rightists are busted doing bad shit, they get a lot of defenders. When liberals and leftists are, they are universally condemned.What do you mean?
I guess Trump wasn’t playing when he said other democrats would be coming out in support of him.
You might be right, but I don't see it.When rightists are busted doing bad shit, they get a lot of defenders. When liberals and leftists are, they are universally condemned.
Did you see anyone defend Menendez, call it a witch hunt, attempt to distract with whataboutism, etc.? I haven't seen anyone do any of that. The reason there's not much of a discussion is because everyone agrees (except a handful of rightists who try to tie his prosecution to some CT).You might be right, but I don't see it.
Democrats got mighty quiet when Bob Menendez got caught. I didn't see much indignation.
Did you miss the part where he wrote "If he's innocent, he should be found as such, and that will also be "Good,?I think in this country we're supposed to wait until something is proven.
You said "universally condemned". I said "got quiet". Am I wrong?Did you see anyone defend Menendez, call it a witch hunt, attempt to distract with whataboutism, etc.? I haven't seen anyone do any of that. The reason there's not much of a discussion is because everyone agrees (except a handful of rightists who try to tie his prosecution to some CT).
Read my whole post. If no one is defending him, the conversation tends to peter out. You can search my history for example. Pretty sure we've known Menendez was a piece of shit for a decade and only a few rightists have defended him.You said "universally condemned". I said "got quiet". Am I wrong?
I did read your whole post, but you didn't answer my question.Read my whole post. If no one is defending him, the conversation tends to peter out. You can search my history for example. Pretty sure we've known Menendez was a piece of shit for a decade and only a few rightists have defended him.
The answer is implied, but if you're being a dick, yeah. There wasn't a long thread because no one defended him, but he was condemned.I did read your whole post, but you didn't answer my question.
Ok. Now I'm a dick because I said you didn't answer my question.The answer is implied, but if you're being a dick, yeah. There wasn't a long thread because no one defended him, but he was condemned.
Not sure what you get out of denying the fact that there is a large and obvious difference in how this stuff is treated by the two major coalitions.