- Joined
- Sep 26, 2016
- Messages
- 21,544
- Reaction score
- 20,591
Don't know if their is a thread on it but Matt and the train company have both put out their statements and allegations.
Matt's Side.
Hughes alleges that the Norfolk Southern Railway ("NS") was negligent by not warning motorists of dangerous conditions at the railway crossing. The facts relate that the train struck the passenger side of Hughes' Chevy Z71 truck at a rail crossing close to his residence in Montgomery County, Illinois. Hughes was knocked out and did not readily revive. But there are no allegations of broken bones or other internal injuries, other than the TBI and related disorders.
According to the lawsuit's allegations, NS did not place appropriate warning signs at the site. Even worse, Hughes alleges that NS knew of the potential danger beforehand and did not act. Furthermore, Hughes stated that he was driving lawfully before the crash. The collision resulted in severe physical damage and a traumatic brain injury.
Norfolk's Side.
The railway believes it is not at fault. NS stated that the crash was Hughes' fault. The company stated that Hughes failed to stop before the crossing. Furthermore, NS states that Hughes did not see the train oncoming and failed to yield the right way. The company goes so far in their rebuttal to state that Hughes "knowingly drove his vehicle onto a railroad grade crossing" and used his cell phone.
Matt's Side.
Hughes alleges that the Norfolk Southern Railway ("NS") was negligent by not warning motorists of dangerous conditions at the railway crossing. The facts relate that the train struck the passenger side of Hughes' Chevy Z71 truck at a rail crossing close to his residence in Montgomery County, Illinois. Hughes was knocked out and did not readily revive. But there are no allegations of broken bones or other internal injuries, other than the TBI and related disorders.
According to the lawsuit's allegations, NS did not place appropriate warning signs at the site. Even worse, Hughes alleges that NS knew of the potential danger beforehand and did not act. Furthermore, Hughes stated that he was driving lawfully before the crash. The collision resulted in severe physical damage and a traumatic brain injury.
Norfolk's Side.
The railway believes it is not at fault. NS stated that the crash was Hughes' fault. The company stated that Hughes failed to stop before the crossing. Furthermore, NS states that Hughes did not see the train oncoming and failed to yield the right way. The company goes so far in their rebuttal to state that Hughes "knowingly drove his vehicle onto a railroad grade crossing" and used his cell phone.