- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Messages
- 24,172
- Reaction score
- 6,401
The book is trash and written at around a 5th or 6th grade level. I don't need to read 300 pages of that horseshit.
You are the one making claims. Specifically you repeatedly claim or infer that the McCorkle synopsis is not legit. It is. As I have stated, it is a pretty accurate summary and at most slightly exaggerated.
You are talking out of your ass, and when I brought the receipts you can't back your nonsensical stance up, which is exactly what I suspected.
You are the one backing up the guy who brags about taking a dirty blade and castrating baby pigs for amusement and taking pleasure in the animal screaming in pain. You actually felt the need to defend that specific thing over and over again.
Page 65
"I held the pig and slit it open, it screamed hysterically."
Page 66
"My brother and I grabbed as many testicles and dead baby pigs as we could. Fiore took off running and we ran after him chucking pig parts at our buddy. It was a wonder we didn't slip, because Mark and I were laughing so hard we were almost crying and our ammunition was all over the ground."
... "finally we cornered him in the barn. We stood there for another minute pelting him with testicles and dead baby pigs while he tried his best to block the carnage. Mark and I were division 1 wrestlers so quitting was not an option."
that's what you are defending.
He literally says they were laughing hysterically.
Yeah buddy. Castrating baby pigs for fun and using their mutilated testicles and dead babies as projectiles to throw at people is "just part of the deal."
See Bob... you were talking out of your ass and completely full of shit.
The problem with talking out of your ass and being completely full of shit is that it doesn't hold up particularly well to scrutiny.
"The book was poorly written so I can make up whatever I want about it" is a pretty novel defense.
What "receipts" are you even talking about? This is literally the first time you've attempted to show anything.
Point to me where he wrote that he "brags about taking a dirty blade and castrating baby pigs for amusement and taking pleasure in the animal screaming in pain"
This is the kind if hyperbole I'm talking about.
I literally already said that castrating animals is part of growing up on a farm. He didn't do it "for fun", he did it because that's what happens in a farm.
And as far as pelting his buddy, I dunno if you remember being a teenager , but you probably did some gross stuff you wouldn't do now. I remember literally having dog poop thrown at me by my buddies and then I returned the favor. Don't act like you didn't do gross shit when you were a teenage boy.
You're so dishonest that you literally have to make up a bunch of bullshit about him "castrating animals for amusement", even as you post passages that don't insinuate that at all.
If you're a teenage boy on a farm, you've had animal parts and excrement of all kinds thrown at you, thrown by you and all amounts of crap like that. I only spent a few summers on a farm, but having a dead animal thrown at you is coming off lightly.
But I've already said this and similar sentiments. I've even said the book isn't good. But even as you dishonestly break down the very passages you're posting, you're still not gonna budge on your opinion regarding a book you've never read.
Last edited: