Scoring criteria says takedowns with no offence don't score unless they lead to fight ending offence.
Legal blows that have immediate or cumulative impact with the potential to contribute towardsthe end of the match with the IMMEDIATE weighing in more heavily than the cumulative impact.
Successful execution of takedowns, submission attempts, reversals and the achievement ofadvantageous positions that produce immediate or cumulative impact with the potential to contribute to the end of the match, with the IMMEDIATE weighing more heavily than thecumulative impact.” It shall be noted that a successful takedown is not merely a changing of position, but the establishment of an attack from the use of the takedown. Top and bottomposition fighters are assessed more on the impactful/effective result of their actions, more sothan their position. This criterion will be the deciding factor in a high majority of decisions whenscoring a round. The next two criteria must be treated as a backup and used ONLY whenEffective Striking/Grappling is 100% equal for the round.
You could argue the early takedowns were slams and are potentially offence. But Finney landed 4 sig strikes all fight and 19 total.Whilst going 8/17 for takedowns.
http://ufcstats.com/fight-details/d1368ca941c1fefc
He didn't attempt any subs or fight ending offence the entirety of the fight.
He landed all 4 of his sig strikes for the fight in round 2. He landed 0 in round 1 and 3.
He had 17 total strikes all fight.
His opponent landed:
1: 6/15 sig/total
2:3/13 sig/total
3:14/65 sig/total
That 30-27 isn't that crazy. Only 1 fighter ever had a chance of finishing that fight and it wasn't Finney.
Finney didn't land a sig strike in the third whilst taking 65 and having his offence shut down. That's a 10-8 within the criteria.