Nope, an appeal to authority would apply if we were discussing abstract concepts. Like if I said that socialism/capitalism/democracy/whatever is great because all these smart people say so.
You are saying that a particular person statement is true because of her credentials and therefore there is no need for any evidence.
But we're discussing something concrete- how much did the US blockade on Cuba cost? In this case, citing a study by a prestigious institution is a valid argument. If you have a study by a similar institution, go ahead and share
You are not citing any study, neither was she.
(BTW, I'm familiar with the US Chamber of Commerce's estimate as well as the Cuban government's estimates)
Yet you refuse to put these studies forward.
Guess it's a good thing we're not in an academic conference but on Sherdog, huh?
Exactly, and that which is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
The best I can come up with: A study by a UN agency
You didnt cited any study whatsoever you cited a newspiece of someone who works in the UN speaking in Cuba and citing a figure from the Cuban government without any evidence to back it up.
I'm accusing you of being astonishingly obtuse on this subject.
Asking for evidence isnt being obtuse, i specifically requested evidence because i know she is speaking out of her ass, as she tends to do a lot of times.
The reason why its impossible to pinpoint the cost of sanctions is because there isnt simply any economic data coming out of Cuba, Cuba isnt part of the IMF or the World Bank or any other world organization where you need to report data and thus people can come out with their independent studies.
No amount of evidence will be good enough.
So you provide none, how convenient.
A UN study isn't good enough.
You didnt cited a UN study.
And based on our past conversations, I'm speculating that an academic paper wouldn't be good enough either because they'll use Cuban numbers and you don't trust those.
Is the paper peer reviewd and independently confirmed?