Did you know that: if you fight in a sport where the athletes are supposed to be clean, even if you publicly accuse a guy of not being clean and suspect the promotion is protecting him, and fight him anyway, you should still have every legal expectation that the fighter is clean. So when it turns out you were right, they he was dirty after the promotion specifically exempted him, the legal obligation should still find fault in the dirty fighter and any allowance the promotion gave that fighter.
Don't know why that remained such a difficult concept for all these, "lol, he said he'd fight a dirty fighter, so that makes it [competely legal] fine" retards parroting the same retarded shit every time.
Also, again no surprise who's at the helm of being a biased, piece-of-shit in this thread, like he does in every thread