It's not a financial incentive in the way that you're thinking. It's a talent incentive that yields financial gain. And that's hard for people to accept. Firing guys in the top 5% of world to hire guys in the top 1% of the world makes more money.
The top 1% will produce more, they'll innovate more, they know more, and they got to the top of their class or group because they are working harder than the rest. For a company that turns on innovation, that's an economic goldmine.
Remember, the innovations that workers come up with largely belong to the employer. Musk is a great example of understanding this. None of his companies are based on his individual innovations. He either acquired the brilliant innovations of others or employed people who innovated on his behalf. No different than Thomas Edison. So companies understand the more innovation they get out of their staff, the more advantage they can create in the marketplace.
And bright minds sharpen bright minds, no different than in athletics.
So, it's definitely financial but it's not about the wage bill.