Except that all first world economies are service based not industrial.
Yes, when a country is on the industrial phase, its better to have some degree of income inequality.
Buying stock is investing.
The crisis of the 30s happened because of overinvestment, which happens when the market shrinks because of low spending. If what you said was true then deflation would be a pretty nice thing, yet, its not.
We are talking about capitalism here, not economics in general, and capitalism needs spending and growth. Too efficient and the system crashes down like its happening in Europe with deflation.
More people suffering in the world because of America and their Saudi regime.
They make the people suffer so that they blame their leaders and have a revolution that puts in a puppet.
Why aren't more American's against this or aren't they aware?
More people suffering in the world because of America and their Saudi regime.
They make the people suffer so that they blame their leaders and have a revolution that puts in a puppet leader.
Why aren't more American's against this or aren't they aware?
More people suffering in the world because of America and their Saudi regime.
They make the people suffer so that they blame their leaders and have a revolution that puts in a puppet leader.
Why aren't more American's against this or aren't they aware?
Any source on all 1st world economies being service? I think Japan Germany and the U.S. would disagree
Stop posting
Why dont these countries just bail themselves out with a US inspired TARP or something?
I mean the US economy was trading more worth in mortgage backed securities than the entire GDP of some of these places for a while, and that went bust. We just printed out more money to keep ourselves afloat for a bit. Now I hear out economy is making a comeback, with the lowest unemployment since the whole debacle started. Pretty sweet for us.
That's no source. Unless you think rod1's imagination is a valid source. I could be wrong. Japan might not make anything. Japan may be nothing more than a nation of middlemen and shopkeepers now.
Now I see your edit.
I stand corrected!
I knew worldwide exploitation of labor was profitable but I am surprised it's this profitable.
Why dont these countries just bail themselves out with a US inspired TARP or something?
I mean the US economy was trading more worth in mortgage backed securities than the entire GDP of some of these places for a while, and that went bust. We just printed out more money to keep ourselves afloat for a bit. Now I hear out economy is making a comeback, with the lowest unemployment since the whole debacle started. Pretty sweet for us.
Why dont these countries just bail themselves out with a US inspired TARP or something?
I mean the US economy was trading more worth in mortgage backed securities than the entire GDP of some of these places for a while, and that went bust. We just printed out more money to keep ourselves afloat for a bit. Now I hear out economy is making a comeback, with the lowest unemployment since the whole debacle started. Pretty sweet for us.
No, its not about capital, its about the means of production. Communists take the entire industries, socialists just tax them.
Also Greece went under because it didnt taxed its business proportionally to its spending.
1: Capitalism started after the middle ages in North West Europe and later in the rest of the west. Because of increased trade, more investment and the industrial revolution. Industry needs investments. So you need people who are saving money and are investing it in companies. Those companies uses machines. So they can make better, cheaper and new products. Those employees are far more productive with machines than with only there bodies and tools. Because they are more productive the earn more money and can buy more, better and new products. With machines scarce resources are used more effectively. So you will get richer societies with better, more and new products. Look at the west before and after the industrial revolution. It's a difference of day and night.
Rich people save and invest more of their money, because good investments create more wealth for them and society. They get more money and societies gets more, better and newer products. If the rest of the society would save more money and make good investments. Then society would become richer. Instead the rest of the people doesn't save money or they even get in debt. So the scarce money of society is then not used for good companies to invest in machines, but wasted by people on consumer goods. Also the great depression started after the popping of the stock market bubble in the end of the 1920's. The problem of the 1920's was they spend to much and were buying too much stock. It was called the Roaring Twenties.
2. Economy is not about equality. It's about effective use of scarce resources.
are you saying Greece went under because they were not taxing enough.
Heh. Ya i likely know far more then you and your ability to cite the wiki.Have you ever read about the Greek crisis? or are you simply parroting what you hear from pundits?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_evasion_and_corruption_in_Greece
Heh. Ya i likely know far more then you and your ability to cite the wiki.
Have you looked into the reason why they say record numbers of Greeks including everyone up to the Prime Minister were avoiding taxes? It was because of the absurd level the greek taxes were raised to.
Got love it. tax until everyone chokes and you get record tax evasion and everyone decides to risk jail to keep some of their money...and have others say it is the tax evaders that are the problem. No. the system was completely broken and over run by bureaucrats and unions who demanded ever more until the base they counted on (the golden goose) could survive no longer. Then threaten them with jail if they don't keep giving. lol.
The revolution was finished long before the global oil price collapse.
That's just the decapitation stroke.