M. Night Shyamalan's GLASS (Dragonlord's Review)

If you have seen GLASS, how would you rate it?


  • Total voters
    85
Just got back.

Its mildy disappointing. Mildly dull.

And yea, the ending isnt good. Its cocky though. Night wants us to ask who certain people are, but after what happenes to our characters, i didnt care.

Risky ending, but falls flat.


Not going to expand on the casts performances, they all do their job.

I'm in the camp that liked the ending.Kinda like how I felt reading the ending of Watchmen vs say the ending of Civil War I.

Thought the whole aim of Shamalamadingdong was to have a grounded, "realistic" comic book movie and the anticlimax(?) was his way of saying fuck you to the Marvel big explosion type ending. Definitely has the same DNA as Unbreakable.
 
It was not promoted as a superhero movie. The superhero aspect in the movie wasn't blatant. Yes, Glass was a comic geek. He wasn't played up as some literal super villain, facing off against a superhero. He was just some fragile dude who was into comics.

This movie is literally Glass recruiting another villain to take on the superhero. Mcavoy is being played up as some kind of supernatural being. It's practically being promoted as a Marvel movie.

Yes, "Unbreakable" was far more subtle. You can watch that movie and not even have to make the comic book superhero connection, for it to work.

What a lot of people don't remember is that Unbreakable came out in 2000. Long before the MCU. It even predated the first X Men and Spider-Man movies. If you'd told cinema goers back then that an ex-drug addict would play a B-List Superhero in a movie that launched a multi-Billion dollar franchise, they would have pissed themselves laughing at you. The Superhero Genre simply didn't exist at that point.

Watching the film for the first time, you really don't know if Dunn is actually Superhuman, or just remarkably strong and tough for a man his age and size. It's not until we see him have visions of the bad things people have done/will do just by touching them that it becomes clear he really does possess Superpowers.

I think that's one of the reasons Unbreakable wasn't a hit; it deconstructed Comic Book Movies before the Genre actually existed.
 
Last edited:
Mick at an art gallery:


Hey now. A bit ironic coming from someone whose most artistic possession hanging on any wall at his home (and in his work office) is almost certainly something like this:
dwyane-wade-2-maria-arango.jpg
 
Some superb acting and HORRIBLE, nonsensical story and storytelling.
Night seems to spend so much time on how he can 'subvert your expectations' and surprise you instead of just making a good, tight story. There's so much unnecessary shit in this movie that it was just baffling as to why he thought certain scenes and conversations were necessary or helpful. Night seems to be great at thinking up ideas, but horrible at actually executing them.
With McAvoy, Jackson, and Willis, this movie should have been so much more than what it was.

I was bored in many parts of the movie, and doing the incredulous DC face multiple times as well at some of the awful dialogue.
McAvoy is really awesome. I'm kind of pissed that his talents and this character were wasted in this shit movie. Jackson's character was great as well. Willis was just alright, but that's mostly because they didn't really give him much to do--despite the time they spent on him in the movie, there wasn't really much of a character analysis of him.
I find Sarah Paulson to be very annoying. She seems like a nice person off camera, but in movies/tv, she is always cast in the same role. And her whole deal in the movie just made no logical sense.
And I also felt there was way too much of a focus on comic books

I gave it a 6/10...that's mostly for McAvoy and Jackson.
 
Hey now. A bit ironic coming from someone whose most artistic possession hanging on any wall at his home (and in his work office) is almost certainly something like this:
dwyane-wade-2-maria-arango.jpg
I’m a yuge art fan. I love art very very much. I also have very beautiful posters of a Lamborghini and F-14 Tomcat but they’re hard to see because my bunk bed is in the way. Sad!
 
I’m a yuge art fan. I love art very very much. I also have very beautiful posters of a Lamborghini and F-14 Tomcat but they’re hard to see because my bunk bed is in the way. Sad!
It warmed my heart to learn this, and now I feel bad. But there's always a silver lining. Just look out the window! Art is everywhere!

trump-putin.jpg
 
I will see it, bad reviews or not. I have come to really like M.Night and have realized that even his bad reviewed movies can still be worth a watch (Not Last Airbender though).
 
Some superb acting and HORRIBLE, nonsensical story and storytelling.
Night seems to spend so much time on how he can 'subvert your expectations' and surprise you instead of just making a good, tight story. There's so much unnecessary shit in this movie that it was just baffling as to why he thought certain scenes and conversations were necessary or helpful. Night seems to be great at thinking up ideas, but horrible at actually executing them.
With McAvoy, Jackson, and Willis, this movie should have been so much more than what it was.

I was bored in many parts of the movie, and doing the incredulous DC face multiple times as well at some of the awful dialogue.
McAvoy is really awesome. I'm kind of pissed that his talents and this character were wasted in this shit movie. Jackson's character was great as well. Willis was just alright, but that's mostly because they didn't really give him much to do--despite the time they spent on him in the movie, there wasn't really much of a character analysis of him.
I find Sarah Paulson to be very annoying. She seems like a nice person off camera, but in movies/tv, she is always cast in the same role. And her whole deal in the movie just made no logical sense.
And I also felt there was way too much of a focus on comic books

I gave it a 6/10...that's mostly for McAvoy and Jackson.

I'm going to say it.. If M. Night was white, his completely shitty dialogue at times would have been pointed out years ago, and he would have disappeared.

Every movie he makes has some of the clumsiest dialogue I have ever seen/heard. Even his good ones. He writes about things he doesn't understand that well, and it shows. The scenes in 'signs' talking about baseball didn't sound like Americans talking about baseball. The early scenes in 'unbreakable' had some HORRIBLE dialogue.. The woman on the train talking about the kid she reps doesn't sound like a sports agent, at all. It's not just sports, either.

M's movies have some of thee worst dialogue moments of any modern movie. He sets atmosphere ok, and has a unique style, but he hasn't been pulling off his ideas in a long time. What you said about him having ideas, but not executing, is spot-on.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to say it.. If M. Night was white, his completely shitty dialogue at times would have been pointed out years ago, and he would have disappeared.

Every movie he makes has some of the clumsiest dialogue I have ever seen. Even his good ones. He writes about things he doesn't understand that well, and it shows. The scenes in 'signs' talking about baseball didn't sound like Americans talking about baseball. The early scenes in 'unbreakable' had some HORRIBLE dialogue.. The woman on the train talking about the kid she reps doesn't sound like a sports agent, at all.

M's movies have done of thee worst dialogue moments of any modern movies. He sets atmosphere ok, and has a unique style, but he hasn't been puking off his ideas in a long time. What you said about him having ideas, but not executing, is spot-I'm.
The Hollywood directors/writers who can write compellingly about sports truly are diamonds in the rough-- more so in this generation than ever. So many bitter nerds behind the camera.

It makes you appreciate the hell out of a talent like Ron Shelton. Cameron Crowe also has the gift.
 
I personally enjoyed it saw it in the theater in arden area.

Oooh, someone else is from Sacramento. I’m not driving way out there to see it. I I live in Elk Grove. There are three different movie theaters here. Or did they close the one on Center Parkway?
 
Oooh, someone else is from Sacramento. I’m not driving way out there to see it. I I live in Elk Grove. There are three different movie theaters here. Or did they close the one on Center Parkway?
I think it's still there. I'm closer to the theater near delta shores so it's either i go to that one or arden it just depends
 
I think it's still there. I'm closer to the theater near delta shores so it's either i go to that one or arden it just depends

Shit, we live really close to each other. You know there’s a theater at Laguna and Big Horn too, right?

But yeah, i’m Really close to Delta Shores.
 
Shit, we live really close to each other. You know there’s a theater at Laguna and Big Horn too, right?

But yeah, i’m Really close to Delta Shores.
Ya tho I've only gone to that one a few times its just a habit of going to the one in arden
 
I'm going to say it.. If M. Night was white, his completely shitty dialogue at times would have been pointed out years ago, and he would have disappeared.

Every movie he makes has some of the clumsiest dialogue I have ever seen. Even his good ones. He writes about things he doesn't understand that well, and it shows. The scenes in 'signs' talking about baseball didn't sound like Americans talking about baseball. The early scenes in 'unbreakable' had some HORRIBLE dialogue.. The woman on the train talking about the kid she reps doesn't sound like a sports agent, at all.

M's movies have done of thee worst dialogue moments of any modern movies. He sets atmosphere ok, and has a unique style, but he hasn't been puking off his ideas in a long time. What you said about him having ideas, but not executing, is spot-I'm.

I don't buy the race angle, but his dialogue is painfully awful. It's the main reason I walked out of "Signs". I just couldn't handle the cringe any longer. It still blows me away at how well that movie was received. It was a true blue turd. Just awful. I think people were just blinded by his previous flicks, and just couldn't come to the realization that he made a complete piece of shit. The blinders finally came off with "The Village". I think "Signs" has fallen out of favor as time has gone on as well. It's like once his career really started to nosedive, people went back and started thinking "Shit, how did we not see this coming?"

"Signs"...so bad. Probably the most overrated movie of all time, for me. Some would say "Avatar"(the Cameron flick), but that flick was merely mediocre. "Signs" was an absolute embarrassment, that was praised like it was the second coming of "Close Encounters of The Third Kind".
 
Some superb acting and HORRIBLE, nonsensical story and storytelling.
Night seems to spend so much time on how he can 'subvert your expectations' and surprise you instead of just making a good, tight story. There's so much unnecessary shit in this movie that it was just baffling as to why he thought certain scenes and conversations were necessary or helpful. Night seems to be great at thinking up ideas, but horrible at actually executing them.
With McAvoy, Jackson, and Willis, this movie should have been so much more than what it was.

I was bored in many parts of the movie, and doing the incredulous DC face multiple times as well at some of the awful dialogue.
McAvoy is really awesome. I'm kind of pissed that his talents and this character were wasted in this shit movie. Jackson's character was great as well. Willis was just alright, but that's mostly because they didn't really give him much to do--despite the time they spent on him in the movie, there wasn't really much of a character analysis of him.
I find Sarah Paulson to be very annoying. She seems like a nice person off camera, but in movies/tv, she is always cast in the same role. And her whole deal in the movie just made no logical sense.
And I also felt there was way too much of a focus on comic books

I gave it a 6/10...that's mostly for McAvoy and Jackson.


Id give it about a 6 too. I also found times in the movie where i was bored.

The doctors character was as bland as she was directed to be and that contributed to the dullness. When her purpose was revealed and her moments were extended at the very end, i sat there and thought: who fucking cares.

I came to see the 3 main characters not this other bullshit. This is how i meant earlier about a bold move landing flat.
 
Update: January 17, 2019

Dragonlord’s Review of M. Night Shyamalan's GLASS
(No Spoilers)

Bottom Line: M. Night Shyamalan disappointingly ruins the exciting cinematic universe he created with a silly story, some clumsy dialogue, stupid character decisions and going in a different, slightly boring direction instead of what the audience wanted.

gMBtuUC.jpg


Representing one of M. Night Shyamalan’s best work, Unbreakable was a slow-burn, suspenseful realistic superhero thriller that was narrated brilliantly with unpredictable twists and turns. Split was a come-out-of-nowhere highly-entertaining horror thriller that signaled M. Night’s potential comeback. Despite the exciting prospect of seeing the return of David Dunn (Bruce Willis) going up against a supernatural serial killer in the Horde (James McAvoy), Glass shatters audience’s expectations and goes off in a totally different and slightly boring direction.

There’s no proper build-up between the confrontation between David and the Horde/the Beast. There’s no variation of a tense cat-and-mouse chase, the two just go at it in the first ten minutes. Glass is in a rush to put these two in the mental hospital where majority of the movie takes place and where I am constantly infuriated upon seeing how impractical and stupid the mental institution’s security methods and protocols are. It does not help that the head shrink Dr. Ellie Staple (Sarah Paulson) is annoying with her way of thinking and the way she talks.

McAvoy again shines with his multiple personality performance but the scene where most of Kevin’s personalities come out in rapid succession felt too gimmicky. Kevin’s character works best when the 4-5 prominent personalities are given screen time.

Enjoying a reprieve from slumming the straight-to-video market, Willis is enjoyable as the likable Dunn but the movie just doesn’t give him too much to do. Samuel L. Jackson as the titular character is very entertaining when he finally breaks free from his catatonic state and we see him outsmart everybody (even if it’s up against the world’s lousiest security institution). Anya Taylor-Joy returns as Casey Cooke looks absolutely lovely but some of her actions are perplexingly questionable and her role in here seemed forced.

Rounding up my thoughts: West Dylan Thordson’s score was good. The film was surprisingly tame, meaning it lacked the edge, the uneasiness, the disturbing images from the previous two installments. The meta subtext and dialogue were clumsily handled and occasionally cheesy. The secret organization’s meetings at the end were so dumb and laughable. The ending was a major disappointment (see spoiler box below). There is no post-credit scene.

Rating: 6/10

WARNING: SPOILER THOUGHTS AND MUSINGS BELOW.

Super sucks that a stupid secret anti-superheroes organization killed David and Kevin and in such underwhelming and meaningless way also. I am okay with Kevin dying but killing off David sucks big time.

The secret anti-superhero organization’s meeting is so impractical and extremely stupid. Instead of meeting in their own secret lair or just even rent a private conference room, they meet in a very public and packed restaurant or lounge and they wait until the last of the patrons leave before they start their meetings.

The clover tattoos as the secret organization's symbol felt like M. Night didn't give it a lot of thought.

Clover = Cloverfield. Hmmm...

When they introduced the plot of Mr. Glass and the Horde trying to blow up the Osaka Tower and David has to stop them, the thought of the showdown happening in public had me getting excited. Shame that it didn’t happen. They would have needed an extra $10 million in their budget to pull that scene off though (Glass’ budget is only $20 million).
 
I was excited about this

I'm not going to believe you
 
I will see it, bad reviews or not. I have come to really like M.Night and have realized that even his bad reviewed movies can still be worth a watch (Not Last Airbender though).

I agree with this. Other than Last Airbender I semi enjoyed all his movies.
 
Back
Top