Im not being a poor sport, but you cant honestly tell me he dominated by doing what? a takedown? Those only should be counted if the fighter does something with it. I agreed with all the stand-ups and that's crazy cuz the ref stood them up from side control....
Also, i understand why he won, but im saying that he should be made example of for not trying to do anything, multiple takedowns and great positions and in most of those positions not 1 strike landed or a sub attempt? What else can you do if not strike or sub? When fighter from the bottom is striking more then a fighter on top you know there is a problem....