• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

LOL @ the Robbie Lawler hype

I'm sure he COULD beat Rory, especially since he already did lol. Lawler dominating WW like he has just shows how weak WW really was. Lawler wasn't even a top 10 MW (or even close to it) and now he is beating all of the top guys. GSP might be a hard match up for him if GSP isn't washed up because he would just be holding him down all night.
 
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

mjl.gif
 
Last edited:
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

Yup Johny had a pretty record. Then he held on to Lawler's legs in the last 2 rounds of a title fight which he admitted he was undisciplined for; this same title fight ended with Johny wanting out of the fight while Robbie looked like he wanted to kill or be killed.

Also,

Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

I present to you, Matt Hughes, an elite fighter during his time, and, IMO, legend of the sport.

Your hard on for pretty records makes you look stupid.
 
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

So Johny won via prettier record?
 
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

Just because you stayed a loser your whole life doesn't mean others can't improve to become winners.

Oh and this is one of the BEST BUMPS EVER.
 
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

That's pure and plain stupidity.
 
LOL at who thinks Robbie isn't elite at WW, he's 6-1 in the UFC with only a loss to the former champ, most of the guys he's beaten were/are top 5/10 fighters. Some argue that he has 10 losses on his record
 
Champ of a stacked division deserves hype.

Has a late career resurgence when everyone had written him off. Deserves hype.

Inspiring to people, no matter what they are going for in life. Deserves hype.
 
Sometimes records don't mean shit. You can have a 30-0 guy face a 16-8 guy and the 16-8 guy can utterly dominate him. It's all about who you have fought and beat. Guys like Robbie are more dangerous because they fight to take risks, they are wildcards and don't strive to win by points to protect their perfect records, and people can easily underestimate them.. "Hmm, I'm 10-0, this guy has ten loses, my odds are pretty good!" They can think.. only to be smashed by a beast of a man that comes out to fight with his meanest game face on.

Look at Chael Sonnen, lots of loses, still super dangerous. Randy Couture at the time, BJ Penn, Vitor, Overeem. All these guys have a lot of loses, but they were or are at the top of the game among the best in the world.

When you got the top fighters fighting each other all the time, somebodys got to take the fall with a L or two on their records. Doesn't mean that they are worse, they can have rematch and even take a W back on many occasions. Silva had 4 loses for the longest time, yet he was #1 P4P for years.
 
Robbie is the worst UFC champ record wise in a while. Atleast Johny had the win/lose record to look comparable to all the other champs who had 2 or less losses. Now you are trying to tell me the WW champ has lost 10 times already? Thats elite? Please, Johny Hendricks rounds 2-3-4 and 48-47, robbery of decade.

Robbery of the decade?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHA

Sorry Robbie's record ain't as pretty, but that doesn't change the fight.
 
His style can be described as, "punch me so I can punch you harder", which is not a very smart plan in the long run.

Uhhh wrong wrong wrong wrong and wrong

Lawler really has not taken that much damage in his career. He's also more of a counter striker if you haven't noticed. Pay attention son.

Oddly enough TS is banned.

Sherdog mods are not forgiving if you don't believe the Lawler hype.
 
Champ of a stacked division deserves hype.

Has a late career resurgence when everyone had written him off. Deserves hype.

Inspiring to people, no matter what they are going for in life. Deserves hype.

He holds the belt now, which means more or less that he deserves it. I'm not saying that he isn't elite or something, but i consider his win over Hendricks controversial. I thought he might have won the 1st fight with Hendricks, but overall he was in a two close decisions where at the end you don't have the feeling like he's undoubtedly the better fighter. Like what will happen if they have a rubber match with Hendricks and Hendricks manage to outpoint him? I find it very hard to be hyped for such a champion. I'm not a fan of finishes, and I like GSP, but Robbie doesn't come even remotely close to win a dominant (gspesque) decision. His win over Rory was also a split decision.

I'm definitely not hyped enough to believe that he will keep the belt for long (and I know that the division is stacked).
 
He holds the belt now, which means more or less that he deserves it. I'm not saying that he isn't elite or something, but i consider his win over Hendricks controversial. I thought he might have won the 1st fight with Hendricks, but overall he was in a two close decisions where at the end you don't have the feeling like he's undoubtedly the better fighter. Like what will happen if they have a rubber match with Hendricks and Hendricks manage to outpoint him? I find it very hard to be hyped for such a champion. I'm not a fan of finishes, and I like GSP, but Robbie doesn't come even remotely close to win a dominant (gspesque) decision. His win over Rory was also a split decision.

I'm definitely not hyped enough to believe that he will keep the belt for long (and I know that the division is stacked).

Honestly, it doesn't even matter how long he keeps it. He has it now, ten years after everyone wrote him off.

That is fucking incredible.
 
Robbie-Lawler-Pic.jpg


L7bHpjy.png


Not a troll thread, not a fighter bashing thread. Seriously. This is about the recent hype of Robbie Lawler, which has gotten completely out of control. People are saying he'd beat Rory, he'd beat GSP, he'd beat the top 5, and so on. This isn't criticism of Robbie Lawler (who I wish the best of luck to), but rather a reminder to sherdoggers who think two KO's in a row = worldbeater.

First of all, he does have a nice win over Koscheck, and another nice win over Voelker. But that's it. The Kosckeck win was great for his standing and put him in the top 10 in official rankings, but the win over Voelker means almost nothing. Voelker is not a top 15 guy and has never been. He lost to Patrick Cote in his previous fight, which should say it all. It's a flashy win but it means nothing in terms of rankings.

With that out of the way, let's looking at Robbie Lawler as a fighter. He's young, 31 years old, and is looking good. But his record shows a different story. He went 3-5 in Strikeforce and is 5-5 in his last ten fights. He's lost guys like Lorenz Larkin, Babalu and Tim Kennedy in that streak. These are not top 10 fighters. And that's just his recent fights - if you go back farther you can see that Lawler has always been a 50/50 fighter. One fight he wins, one fight he loses. He's a good fighter, but he's not a consistent fighter. To those introduced to him by his recent UFC results he looks like a superstar, but to those who have been around a bit we know that he gets a nice win or two then crashes back down to Earth in his next fight.

Now to those saying his losses are at MW and his last 2 wins show that he's a beast at WW, remember that he went to MW for a reason. He lost to Evan Tanner, Pete Spratt and was KO'd (!) by Nick Diaz with one punch. It was awhile ago, but he didn't go to MW because he felt it was his natural weight class, he went there because he was chased there. And now he's back to WW and people are thinking that this is his weightclass, this is where he's always belonged, and they don't know why he wasn't always a WW.

When Robbie fights some of higher ranked UFC fighters you are going to see why he's not taken as seriously as some of you may want as a top contender. He's got an impressive skillset which he uses with a lot of aggression and power to finish fights, but against more complete, skilled fighters his gameplan doesn't usually play out the way he wants to. When he wins, he tends to win spectacularly (he does not decision win people), but he also loses about half his fights. His gameplan is too straight forward to work against the top UFC guys, and especially against someone like Rory Mac, who people are thinking is going to lose to Lawler if Dana gets the fight put together like he wants. Rory in particular is too big, too rangy, and too good at keeping distance to lose to Lawler. He just left MW and he's going to beat a massive WW? Smart money is that Rory Mac is a huge favorite in that fight. Same for most other top fights.

That said, Lawler is always entertaining and great to watch. When he wins, he wins in exciting fashion. Just don't forget that he's been here awhile and never really been a contender. Smart money is he ends up ranked 12-15 and sits around there.

Damn right. Great post.

Lawler needs to PROVE he is top level.

By beating someone like Rory...

or Hendricks...

or Matt Brown...

or Jake Ellenberger...

or Koscheck...


Good grief.
 
Damn right. Great post.

Lawler needs to PROVE he is top level.

By beating someone like Rory...

or Hendricks...

or Matt Brown...

or Jake Ellenberger...

or Koscheck...


Good grief.

i'm dying. :icon_lol::icon_lol::icon_lol:
 
Lawler is a 35 fight warrior, he got butt-hurt when he lost to Tanner and Diaz way back in 2004 and like a lot of young fighters thought he was being mistreated by the UFC and went on a self-imposed exile for 8 years.

Back then Lawler was a fighter I did not like much at all despite his winning ways and I kinda cheered when he took his whining ways on the road. Now he's seems to be a more mature fighter, less ego and focusing on his craft. I like the new Lawler, I hope he does well for as long as he can but at the end of the day his reign as Champ will not be too long but I hope he can make enough money to set himself up for his retirement.
 
lawler's god but i think he'd get tooled by diaz, condit, lombard and probly rory
 
Back
Top