Limit on Fighting for Title

[Subline]

 

[Nintendo 64]

No. I think the second best fighter in the division should fight the best.

Rematch limits we can talk though...

 

[Here's Johnny!]

If its not against the same guy a perennial top 5 guy could get 6 title shots for all I care... Urijah Faber deserved his many title shots

 

[SamuraiBro]

Unlimited title shots for fighters I like Fanks ‍

 

[milliniar]

Two losses the the same champ unless competitive.

As long as you win fights after the first loss.

 

[Alpha_T83]

Gane shouldn't get another title shot, but he will.

 

[wrb]

They should have more rules for title holders, if that cost more so be it. Its a balance between a sport and entertainment but once fighters start thinking they can just not fight contenders and hang out for a year+ it becomes theater. Make it more economically beneficial to be fighting as a defending champ which gets better as the defenses increase. If anything, stop letting fighters and fans think they have any control who the champ fights, its annoying and a waste of time/resources plus its perfect for bots to abuse and exploit.

 

[Clark Rogers]

If someone keeps beating everyone but the champ, they deserve a title shot IMO. If they do that cycle several times, so be it.

 

[Ghostoftheville]

No. Generally speaking it takes so much to earn a shot within a division most can't earn a second title shot and eventually get passed by as younger and hungrier challengers show up. Now we have the issue of challengers being more popular than the champs so they're getting multiple shots without earning them.

 

[Tweak896]

Funny how many are pissed about Gane. Who the fuck else?

Aspinall vs Volkov 2? After Volkov won by being controlled for 3 rounds and slightly landing a strike before it?

Waldo? Already beat by worn Pavlovich and doesn't seem like champ material.

I'll give you Pereira. He's probably earned a shot.

I think worse than 3 title shots is champs taking a long time to defend their belt first. Put a hard limit on that, strip champs that are injured or sitting around. If you can't defend after 6 months, then the title is vacant and the next best two step up.

 

[HNIC215]

No, that’s dumb.

But they should limit rematches —> especially immediate rematches unless they are a close banger.

Sometimes we spend years watching the same 3-4 people take turns fighting each other.

We need more activity and a steady rotation of fresh matchups.

Rankings need to mean something. Bring back the authenticity this sport had years ago.

 

[Vespasian70AD]

I’d rather them bring in mandatory defenses for Champs. Defend every 6 months or vacate.

 

[Thy]

My main question is keilbasa with mashed potato's or baked chicken thighs with alfredo pasta? and if with pasta, thin spaghetti or farfalle?