- Joined
- Jul 20, 2011
- Messages
- 53,978
- Reaction score
- 31,146
A recall effort against a California judge was announced on Monday in a sexual assault case at Stanford University that ignited public outrage after the defendant was sentenced to a mere six months in jail and his father complained that his son’s life had been ruined for “20 minutes of action” fueled by alcohol and promiscuity.
In court, the victim had spoken out against the inequities of the legal process, arguing that the trial, the sentencing and the legal system’s approach to sexual assault — from the defense lawyer’s questions about what she wore that night to her attacker’s sentence — were irrevocably marred by male and class privilege.
The case, which had made headlines after the suspect was found guilty in March, began to seize the public’s attention anew after a Santa Clara County Superior Court judge, Aaron Persky, on Thursday handed the defendant, Brock Allen Turner, 20, what many critics denounced as a lenient sentence, including three years’ probation, for three felony counts of sexual assault.
According to the judge: “A prison sentence would have a severe impact on him. I think he will not be a danger to others.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/07/u...ents-of-victim-and-attackers-father.html?_r=0
Was surprised to see no thread on this here since its making the rounds on social media. What do you guys think? I don't know that much about the case but it does seem like a lenient sentence for a legit rape convict.