- Joined
- Sep 23, 2010
- Messages
- 23,121
- Reaction score
- 172
I think it's understanding gravity that will be difficult for you.Serious question. This should be simple enough to answer.
I think it's understanding gravity that will be difficult for you.Serious question. This should be simple enough to answer.
What?This makes no sense in your scenario the plane would not keep that energy either. It would take off and the Earth would easily outpace it because it's only moving at 300 mph. Whereas, if the plane flew the other opposite direction it would just need to let the Earth rotate underneath it and the job of getting to it's destination would be much simpler.
Well if it was flying westbound, the speed relative to the centre of the earth would be 700mph instead of 1300mph, while the earths surface continues to rotate at 1000mph. Meaning that regardless of the direction of travel, the speed of the aircraft relative to the surface of the earth remains at 300mphOn top of that if the plane were flying against the rotation of the Earth in your model and somehow it held onto all that kinetic energy and was REALLY moving at 1,3000 mph rather then 300 mph then it should still arrive faster then the eastbound flight because it's destination is moving toward it.
What?
This is high school level physics, an object retains its kinetic energy until it is acted upon by an external force. It doesn't just disappear.
Well if it was flying westbound, the speed relative to the centre of the earth would be 700mph instead of 1300mph, while the earths surface continues to rotate at 1000mph. Meaning that regardless of the direction of travel, the speed of the aircraft relative to the surface of the earth remains at 300mph
I doesn't exist, I understand that much.I think it's understanding gravity that will be difficult for you.
No insulting please that is completely unnecessary.No, numbnuts. The kinetic energy is still going with the rotation of the Earth, which is also moving, no matter which way you take off.
What?
This is high school level physics, an object retains its kinetic energy until it is acted upon by an external force. It doesn't just disappear.
Well if it was flying westbound, the speed relative to the centre of the earth would be 700mph instead of 1300mph, while the earths surface continues to rotate at 1000mph. Meaning that regardless of the direction of travel, the speed of the aircraft relative to the surface of the earth remains at 300mph
Of course not, the Earth is just magically accelerating upward at a constant rate infinitely.I doesn't exist, I understand that much.
You refusing to understand what we're saying is not an argument.No insulting please that is completely unnecessary.
Also, check in with your fellow globe Earther who says that the kinetic energy is NOT going with the rotation of the Earth but rather the plane maintains the kinetic energy. Please guys come to consensus. Don't believe me well here's his post.
To add to that how is the kinetic energy of the Earth affecting a plane in mid air and making it move at 1,000 mph faster then it should be?
No the Earth is stationary. The Earth is NOT accelerating upward. This is a lie put forth by planted shills who want to make the flat Earth look foolish.Of course not, the Earth is just magically accelerating upward at a constant rate infinitely.
You refusing to understand what we're saying is not an argument.
The eastbound aircraft is moving 1300mph relative to the centre of the earth and 300mph relative to the surface of the earth. Is physical relativity that hard to grasp? I'd you're driving in your car, you're moving 0mph relative to your steering wheel but 60mph relative to the road.No one's saying that the energy would disappear but it does diminish or dissipate. If you had a pendulum and held to one end and let it go eventually it'd stop it does not just continue to move at the same rate back and forth again and again. This is the reason why I have no idea why you'd say that a plane would fly really at 1,300 mph instead of 300.
A planes speed alone changes constantly because of the changes the pilot makes midair. Also, take into account wind resistance and other atmospheric factors. Your 1,000 mph stored up kinetic energy idea makes no sense.
Again with the relativity, it starts at 1000mph relative to the earths centre, and then depending on which direction it takes off, it's speed becomes 1000mph +/- 300mphYou have absolutely no explanation for this. Why is the speed of the Earth all of a sudden 700mph instead of 1300mph? Also, how can you even prove this what's your source for these numbers (going the opposite direction) or something we can observe that can help prove your point.
Yeah, it's the shills that do that.No the Earth is stationary. The Earth is NOT accelerating upward. This is a lie put forth by planted shills who want to make the flat Earth look foolish.
No one knows how long it takes to dig straight through.
How do the models not explain our experienced world? According to ball Earth lies we stand upside down and blood doesn't flow to our heads while we're in Australia. This makes sense to our world?
How is flat Earth a convoluted architecture of the world?
As for the flights from Sydney to Johannesburg it's been shown multiple times that most of the flights have multiple layovers and are NOT direct. Now some will point to flights that are supposedly direct flights from Sydney to Johannesburg and say "aha they're real." There are few things that these people miss however.
1. The flights can easily be cancelled.
2. The flights can be listed and priced out of the range of the average person.
3. The flights do exist and the plane rides the roaring 40's, strong winds that reach absurd speeds around Antarctica and get to it's destination for those reasons.
These are only a few possible explanations for those flights. Remember however, the vast majority of flights in these places have layovers which is a home run for flat Earth.
No the conspiracy is NOT 2,500 years old, it's only around 500 years old. Nichaluas Copernicus is the one who REALLY set off the ball off theory rolling. Before Copernicus the vast, vast, vast majority of the world thought the Earth was flat and stationary. It's a common myth that man thought the Earth was a ball hurtling through space 2,000 years ago.
And no millions of people don't have to be in on the conspiracy that's another common myth. Only the elite of the elite know, the vast majority of those beneath them have no clue whatsoever.
Also, if you'd like I can link you a flat Earth documentary.
No the Earth is stationary. The Earth is NOT accelerating upward. This is a lie put forth by planted shills who want to make the flat Earth look foolish.
If you have any questions let me know.
i didn't know what to expext going into this but wow, that was pretty fascinating if i'm being honest. i just don't know what to believe any more
6 And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” 7 So God made the dome and separated the waters that were under the dome from the waters that were above the dome. And it was so. 8 God called the dome Sky. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.
The heavens are telling the glory of God;
and the firmament proclaims his handiwork.
In the heavens he has set a tent for the sun,
5 which comes out like a bridegroom from his wedding canopy,
and like a strong man runs its course with joy
He set the earth on its foundations;
it can never be moved.
Then Joshua spoke to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the sons of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel,
“O sun, stand still at Gibeon,
And O moon in the valley of Aijalon.”
13So the sun stood still, and the moon stopped,
Until the nation avenged themselves of their enemies.
Is it not written in the book of Jashar? And the sun stopped in the middle of the sky and did not hasten to go down for about a whole day.
14There was no day like that before it or after it, when the LORD listened to the voice of a man; for the LORD fought for Israel.
The eastbound aircraft is moving 1300mph relative to the centre of the earth and 300mph relative to the surface of the earth. Is physical relativity that hard to grasp? I'd you're driving in your car, you're moving 0mph relative to your steering wheel but 60mph relative to the road.
Again with the relativity, it starts at 1000mph relative to the earths centre, and then depending on which direction it takes off, it's speed becomes 1000mph +/- 300mph
Relative to the surface of the earth it starts at 0mph.
So you ignored my entire post and didn't even try to refute the points I made about the flight paths. Then you said something about gravity and blood. Please clarify what you're getting at and I'd be glad to answer your question.Two things..First..
Blood flow and gravity, again pretty simple explanation why. Very simple actually, and it's troubling there's people out here that think like you.
Secondly, you still have answered why. What's the reason they are hiding this flat earth from the common man