• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Kyrie Irving believes the Earth is flat

the fact that it is uniform along the earth's surface is damning evidence of a "spherical" earth (it's actually lightly flatter at the poles). The earth cannot be a disk of uniform thickness, it's density or thickness would have to vary or the earth would have to be insanely large with us only ever visiting a minute central region.

Give up your inane shit-show.
No one said the Earth was a "disk of uniform thickness."

Also, you replied to my question asking how can one know the moon is a ball when you have NEVER seen the other side with your own two eyes? It's called the dark side of the moon for a reason so I would be interested to see what your answer is.
 
Several lunar capsules have orbited the moon. The Luna 3 from the USSR landed on the 'dark side of the moon' in 1960 IIRC.

Of course you are probably going to say that all of these lunar manned/unmanned missions were faked and it's all a grand conspiracy taking place over 60yrs involving the US, USSR, european space agency, India, China, and Japan - LMAO!

No one can confirm this for themselves. No one has the budget to fact check them we only have to take their word for it. So you'll trust the word of people with no way to confirm or verify it for yourself. NASA says they landed on the dark side of the moon so it happened. If some con artists said "I worked on architecture projects all over the world I swear so hire me" in so many words you wouldn't just take his word for it.

If you to believe people traveled 237,000 miles unharmed multiple times to the dark side of moon and back go ahead but just realize you have no proof. And you have yet to provide proof to show the dark side of the moon really exists. And isn't it convenient that we just happen to never see the other side of the moon that is allegedly a ball.
 
I was doing some survey work for a long distance underground gas transmission pipe. We had to factor in the curvature of the earth otherwise we get an error in the design of about 8 inches vertical for every mile horizontal.
 
I was doing some survey work for a long distance underground gas transmission pipe. We had to factor in the curvature of the earth otherwise we get an error in the design of about 8 inches vertical for every mile horizontal.

Snipers also have to adjust for curvature of the earth or else they'll completely miss their target. But they're probably in on the conspiracy anyways so we can blindly dismiss that
 
It's called the Coriolis Effect. I'm sure pilots and air traffic controllers the world over will be thrilled they no longer have to adjust for it.
 
LMAO. Really? Besides none of the models for it working at all to explain our experienced world? Or the fact that they involve the most convoluted architecture of the world possible (and still don't work, how long is a flight from Sydney to Johannesburg)? Or that the conspiracy would have to be over 2,500 years old with millions of people from literally every part of the planet staying true to the lie? And for what exactly? Or how about, I've approached land from the ocean many, many times?

How do the models not explain our experienced world? According to ball Earth lies we stand upside down and blood doesn't flow to our heads while we're in Australia. This makes sense to our world?

How is flat Earth a convoluted architecture of the world?

As for the flights from Sydney to Johannesburg it's been shown multiple times that most of the flights have multiple layovers and are NOT direct. Now some will point to flights that are supposedly direct flights from Sydney to Johannesburg and say "aha they're real." There are few things that these people miss however.

1. The flights can easily be cancelled.

2. The flights can be listed and priced out of the range of the average person.

3. The flights do exist and the plane rides the roaring 40's, strong winds that reach absurd speeds around Antarctica and get to it's destination for those reasons.

These are only a few possible explanations for those flights. Remember however, the vast majority of flights in these places have layovers which is a home run for flat Earth.

No the conspiracy is NOT 2,500 years old, it's only around 500 years old. Nichaluas Copernicus is the one who REALLY set off the ball off theory rolling. Before Copernicus the vast, vast, vast majority of the world thought the Earth was flat and stationary. It's a common myth that man thought the Earth was a ball hurtling through space 2,000 years ago.

And no millions of people don't have to be in on the conspiracy that's another common myth. Only the elite of the elite know, the vast majority of those beneath them have no clue whatsoever.

Also, if you'd like I can link you a flat Earth documentary.
 
Snipers also have to adjust for curvature of the earth or else they'll completely miss their target. But they're probably in on the conspiracy anyways so we can blindly dismiss that
And the rotation of the earth as well

Never mind snipers, you can conduct a proof by flushing a toilet in each hemisphere, and even in different parts of the same hemisphere.

Kyrie ass was born in Australia he should know
 
How do the models not explain our experienced world? According to ball Earth lies we stand upside down and blood doesn't flow to our heads while we're in Australia. This makes sense to our world?

How is flat Earth a convoluted architecture of the world?

As for the flights from Sydney to Johannesburg it's been shown multiple times that most of the flights have multiple layovers and are NOT direct. Now some will point to flights that are supposedly direct flights from Sydney to Johannesburg and say "aha they're real." There are few things that these people miss however.

1. The flights can easily be cancelled.

2. The flights can be listed and priced out of the range of the average person.

3. The flights do exist and the plane rides the roaring 40's, strong winds that reach absurd speeds around Antarctica and get to it's destination for those reasons.

These are only a few possible explanations for those flights. Remember however, the vast majority of flights in these places have layovers which is a home run for flat Earth.

No the conspiracy is NOT 2,500 years old, it's only around 500 years old. Nichaluas Copernicus is the one who REALLY set off the ball off theory rolling. Before Copernicus the vast, vast, vast majority of the world thought the Earth was flat and stationary. It's a common myth that man thought the Earth was a ball hurtling through space 2,000 years ago.

And no millions of people don't have to be in on the conspiracy that's another common myth. Only the elite of the elite know, the vast majority of those beneath them have no clue whatsoever.

Also, if you'd like I can link you a flat Earth documentary.
Lol, I thought you were serious before. Good work, man. LMAO.
 
Snipers also have to adjust for curvature of the earth or else they'll completely miss their target. But they're probably in on the conspiracy anyways so we can blindly dismiss that
This is another common misconception that's been passed around. If there is an adjustment for the rotating Earth then what are the calculations for the adjustments to be made? How are snipers pulling these calculations out of their butts before making a shot at a very great distance? How can you also prove that it's not actually the wind that's causing the need for adjustments?

To add to that if this were true, since the Earth allegedly rotates from West to East, flights going eastward would take much longer because the plane is traveling with the rotation of the Earth.
 
This is another common misconception that's been passed around. If there is an adjustment for the rotating Earth then what are the calculations for the adjustments to be made? How are snipers pulling these calculations out of their butts before making a shot at a very great distance? How can you also prove that it's not actually the wind that's causing the need for adjustments?

To add to that if this were true, since the Earth allegedly rotates from West to East, flights going eastward would take much longer because the plane is traveling with the rotation of the Earth.

Didn't read

Will repost my previous question:

Why is your line of sight greater the higher you are u goof
 
And the rotation of the earth as well

Never mind snipers, you can conduct a proof by flushing a toilet in each hemisphere, and even in different parts of the same hemisphere.

Kyrie ass was born in Australia he should know
As I told someone else if the Earth were truly rotating West to East then Westward flights would be MUCH shorter and no one would do an Eastward flight unless the destination was very close because Eastward flights are traveling with the rotation of the Earth.

Not true. A toilet or sinks drains based on the shape of the basin not because of the Earth's rotation. If the Earth's rotation controlled something as simple as the movement of the water in your toilet or sink drains then there should be no still body of water on the planet.
 
Didn't read

Will repost my previous question:
You're ducking answering my questions Earth is NOT a globe you've been lied to.

Also, your previous question is easily answered. You can see further because you are higher I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Would you be interested in a flat Earth documentary?
 
This is another common misconception that's been passed around. If there is an adjustment for the rotating Earth then what are the calculations for the adjustments to be made? How are snipers pulling these calculations out of their butts before making a shot at a very great distance? How can you also prove that it's not actually the wind that's causing the need for adjustments?

To add to that if this were true, since the Earth allegedly rotates from West to East, flights going eastward would take much longer because the plane is traveling with the rotation of the Earth.
If you're going straight east or west, the effect disappears altogether. The Coriolis effect exists because the equator is spinning much faster than the poles. It's greatest going south to north or vice versa because your natural momentum if you take off at the equator is taking you west much faster than the Earth is spinning 20 degrees of latitude north of it. Going straight east or west your momentum never differs from your path.

And snipers are dealing with a very limited field. They just memorize based on degree and distance. They don't have to make complex calculations.
 
You're ducking answering my questions Earth is NOT a globe you've been lied to.

Also, your previous question is easily answered. You can see further because you are higher I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. Would you be interested in a flat Earth documentary?

"You can see further because you are higher"

No shit that's what I said. If the earth were flat the height you're viewing it from wouldn't matter

But you can see further the higher you are. Why is that?
 
Back
Top