Social Kyle Rittenhouse updates

nhbbear said:
Well, I see an innocent and acquitted man that had his life shattered because people like you are still crying over him shooting the man that raped children. Poor, poor jojo-may the lord greet him with a crowd of young, virgin boys.
Click to expand...
Fuck Kyle Rittenhouse.

He was a borderline retarded white supremacist incel who went looking for trouble and found it. Anyone who idolizes him is a complete fucking loser.
 
DoctorTaco said:
“I wish I had my fucking AR, I'd start shooting rounds at them"

-Kyle rittenhouse 2 weeks before shooting 3 people.
Click to expand...
It always amazes me how people take sides in situations like this.
In this life its frequent that 2 evil & scummy people cross paths due to both of their terrible and destructive actions.

Saying you think Rittenhouse is revolting due to his behavior up until the shooting & directly after the shooting does not equate to sticking up for "child predators."

Also if people are in other threads still pulling their MAGA shtick they should probably STFU virtue signaling about not liking child predators.
 
WklySportsMemes said:
Im probably one of the few lefties who would disagree with that in instances of protecting ones personal property & "castle."
Click to expand...
Shooting someone over theft doesn’t seem right, especially when it’s a corporate chain business. Far different than a home invasion, imo. I’ve got no issue with a home owner shooting an intruder
 
DoctorTaco said:
Shooting someone over theft doesn’t seem right, especially when it’s a corporate chain business. Far different than a home invasion, imo. I’ve got no issue with a home owner shooting an intruder
Click to expand...
I agree about public,commercial, & corporate stuff.
I think where I differ from most liberals is
#1. I feel that your vehicle & most of your personal property should be considered an extension of your home.
#2. I even take it further to where even if somebody doesn't enter your residence, but is stealing your personal property off of your real estate/property....oh well...too bad...so sad....Not that I would do something like that. However, I support a man's individual God given right to protect his legally earned property over anyone's transgression to violate and steal from another. But I'm materialistic & a workaholic so I value everything I earned more than it probably should be. I also think thieves are on my list of lowest levels of "human beings."
 
WklySportsMemes said:
I agree about public,commercial, & corporate stuff.
I think where I differ from most liberals is
#1. I feel that your vehicle & most of your personal property should be considered an extension of your home.
#2. I even take it further to where even if somebody doesn't enter your residence, but is stealing your personal property off of your real estate/property....oh well...too bad...so sad....Not that I would do something like that. However, I support a man's individual God given right to protect his legally earned property over anyone's transgression to violate and steal from another. But I'm materialistic & a workaholic so I value everything I earned more than it probably should be. I also think thieves are on my list of lowest levels of "human beings."
Click to expand...
I’d be curious where you’d put the scope and scale on this. Would it be justified to shoot someone for stealing 20 dollars? 10? 2? What if they go onto you property and steal the cans out of your recycling?
 
DoctorTaco said:
I’d be curious where you’d put the scope and scale on this. Would it be justified to shoot someone for stealing 20 dollars? 10? 2? What if they go onto you property and steal the cans out of your recycling?
Click to expand...
Its a slippery slope. I honestly cant answer that. Its one of those things people can go around pontificating about, but truth be told not have any idea what they would actually do until put in that realistic situation.
Honestly, thats why I like certain dog breeds. They can mitigate you having to be put in that position. Gives you another hopefully none lethal option to protect your property or stop a threat with force.

Sometimes its not just monetary value too. What if its like an heirloom or irreplaceable things that hold far more value to somebody than their actual worth?
What happens if the victim/property owner is short on rent & needs every penny to get by? Or people steal pets all the time too. Seems too nuanced to put hard caps on.

To me it seems backwards to always put the onus on the victim of the intial crime. Isn't the better question sometimes for society to gear it towards the transgresser & ask "why would the criminal victimize an innocent bystander & put their own life at risk for x amount of money?"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
1,280,488
Messages
58,288,533
Members
175,995
Latest member
rodriigoxd

Share this page

Back
Top