This is bizarre.
'He was stupid for being there?'
What about the rioters?
Gee, let's extrapolate: also taking dangerous risks, hence some are now dead.
It's not an argument, and it's certainly not weak, it's common sense.
You get it.
This is bizarre.
'He was stupid for being there?'
What about the rioters?
Gee, let's extrapolate: also taking dangerous risks, hence some are now dead.
It's not an argument, and it's certainly not weak, it's common sense.
I’d be happy to debate you once you make an argument.
He wasn’t sticking up for himself. He literally went to another state looking for a fight of some sort. Untrained idiot kids with guns is not the answer.
BLM isn't violent.
There are fifty chapters and I'm sure there are exceptions, but those exceptions are condemned by the whole.
They didn't divide America but they damaged white supremacy, which is why you hate them.
Conservatives called members of the civil rights movement Marxist terrorists, and you're doing the same now with BLM. Conservatives love to quote that one passage from that one speech from MLK, but when he was alive they called him the most dangerous man in America. If MLK had a criticism of BLM it would be that they're too passive.
If you were thinking like a responsible adult, you would have responded to my question with "No one should be out rioting". Instead you responded with "Adults", meaning that it's okay with you if adults are involved in riots.
My argument is that our states/government should have nipped the BLM riots in the bud early on with force instead of the police standing around allowing people to burn down buildings while causing billions of dollars of damage while a good 10-20 people got murdered. No one should be involved in situations like that whether you have "ties" to the community or are a certain age or for any other reason.
If you were thinking like a responsible adult, you would have responded to my question with "No one should be out rioting". Instead you responded with "Adults", meaning that it's okay with you if adults are involved in riots.
My argument is that our states/government should have nipped the BLM riots in the bud early on with force instead of the police standing around allowing people to burn down buildings while causing billions of dollars of damage while a good 10-20 people got murdered. No one should be involved in situations like that whether you have "ties" to the community or are a certain age or for any other reason.
My argument is that he shouldn’t have been there. And you just admitted that kids make stupid decisions. You just made my point lol. He made a stupid/moronic decision. But you’re also trying to angle to argue other things that really have nothing to do with my argument. The legality of it all was already litigated and a decision was made. I respect the decisions of the courts, but you bring up other crap. Who is the emotional one here? Lol
Your response to a reaction to authoritarianism is more authoritarianism lmao
'Just nip it in the bud'
Jesus dude! Obviously no one should be involved in a riot. Didn’t think that needed to be explained. By answering “adults”, I was talking about not having a 17 year old try to solve problems created by “adults”. I have to give you credit, you’re really coming out of left field with whatever nonsensical argument you’re tying to make. I give you a pass for asking the dumbest question; you probably haven’t been following the thread.
Police ending riots is authoritarianism? Do you even realize how many laws are being broken during these "protests" that turn into riots? They have full authority to prevent people from breaking the law. Don't break the law and the police aren't necessary.
Police ending riots is authoritarianism? Do you even realize how many laws are being broken during these "protests" that turn into riots? They have full authority to prevent people from breaking the law. Don't break the law and the police aren't necessary.
I'm just responding to what you've been saying. You asked someone what were Kyle's ties to the community and you've said he never should have been there. Why are you cherry picking this one individual? Why not question what the pedophiles ties to the community were and whether or not he should have been there? What about every other person at that riot? You already stated that adults should be at riots so don't get mad when I call you on that. If you're going to involve yourself in a debate like this, be prepared to get your shit called on.
You're just biased against this kid. No shit that kids shouldn't be running around with AR15s at a riot. No one should be running around and involved in a riot at all. But that's not the point you're making. You're singling him out and I'm just showing you that the points you're making are not very good ones. A level headed individual would be saying that no one should have been involved in this situation and it never should have turned into a riot if the police were allowed to do their jobs.
You are obviously partly right.
However the answer to civil unrest goes beyond authoritarianism, and heavy handed silencing of the masses is likely to make things worse. It would be seen as antagonistic.
In life, there is balance. Being unrealistic and trying to shut everything down wouldn't work. It barely works in any country.
“No shit that kids shouldn't be running around with AR15s at a riot.”
Thank you for supporting my argument
I agree there is a balance but the balance was way out of whack that year.
I don't support your argument because your argument is that kids shouldn't be in riots but adults should. I said "I'd like to know who should be involved in a riot" and you said "adults".
No one should be involved in riots. Your stance is based on partisan cherry picking.
You’re lost in the sauce if that was your takeaway.
You asked me the strange question of who should be involved in a riot. I didn’t think you meant that literally. That would be like me asking you, who should be involved in a bank robbery. But I wouldn’t ask you such a stupid question. For your benefit, I clarified my stance when I told you that a kid shouldn’t be involved in adult matters. That doesn’t mean that the adults are right or justified in their actions. I’m merely saying someone should be looking out for a kid in that situation.
Idk why I’m explaining this to you anymore. You totally changed the direction of what was being debated here. Feel free to respond but my debate with you ends.
BLM didn't do shit except get a bunch of assholes free sneakers and the leaders millions of dollars. They were founded and fueled by lies. I couldn't care less if you think I'm a white supremacist. Because of people like you, that insult has no weight anymore.
Let them riot my man. My 17 year old son is not going out there.
He wasn’t sticking up for himself. He literally went to another state looking for a fight of some sort. Untrained idiot kids with guns is not the answer.
There were people burning buildings down, looting businesses and assaulting people. There was a pedophile running around assaulting people with a skateboard and another criminal with a gun attempting to shoot Kyle while he was being assaulted by a skateboard and out of all those criminals and all that criminal activity, you focus in on Kyle.
How about you call out the actual criminals first and then we can get to Kyle after that? I might have a shred of respect for you if you call out the people who were actually committing crimes here instead of the one kid who got acquitted of committing any crimes.
Neither would mine, but Kyle’s parents have never been called “good parents.” But the “he shouldn’t have been there” argument is as stupid as the “he crossed state lines WITH A GUN!!!!!, which is of course proven false.
No one should have been there. There shouldn’t have been a riot because a cop shot a violent racist armed with a knife that was trying to flee the scene in a vehicle he was about to steal with children in the vehicle. Fuck blake. Thank goodness he has no use of his dick so he can never make another child or have sex again. But the fucking morons are the people that wanted to riot and burn millions in property, attack cops and old property owners without anyone to intervene because everyone was scared of the blm riots because to even speak out against them was considered racist and still is and to do anything other than participate when present put you at risk for violence. Fuck them as well. I don’t like Kyle as a person, but I respect what he did. He stepped up when few others would.
It was like 20 mins away from where he lived and his dad lived there and he worked there. How about the shitbags that traveled many miles to get there to riot over a shitbag rapist who fought police when they dared to try to arrest him and he was armed with a knife and then tried to steal a car that was filled with children just so he could evade capture. blake earned his current condition. Fuck him, and fuck all the animals that burned down the town, attacked police and old people trying to prevent the looting of their property.
And he wasn’t picking a fight. Do you know anything about his actions that day? Cleaning up, treating people that were wounded, trying to prevent people from destroying more businesses, and he tried to run from multiple attacks. He was picking a fight but he was more than prepared when shit got real bad.
Goes both ways. No one should've been there. A curfew was in place.A 17 year old had no business being there. The adults, his parents, the community failed him.
BLM isn't violent.
There are fifty chapters and I'm sure there are exceptions, but those exceptions are condemned by the whole.
They didn't divide America but they damaged white supremacy, which is why you hate them.
Conservatives called members of the civil rights movement Marxist terrorists, and you're doing the same now with BLM. Conservatives love to quote that one passage from that one speech from MLK, but when he was alive they called him the most dangerous man in America. If MLK had a criticism of BLM it would be that they're too passive.