Kushner in Trouble

Uh.

rodrosen.gif


(b) (ii)
(c)

kind of need you to point your eyes at them, please.
 
If they come to look for a stolen car, and they find a bag of crack, you are still, in fact, fucked.
 
ahoy President Thompson,

i don't really like this sort of stuff.

if the Mueller investigation's primary thrust is to investigate malfeasance in the Trump campaign vis a vis its cooperation with Russian agents to disrupt the recent elections - or any coverup relating to the matter, thats terrific. i am all for it, and i think its a legitimate concern no matter which party holds the reigns of power.

beyond that, i get that its always a good thing to uncover criminal activity - but i consider this all tangential to the praemissa originale, you know? at this point, it should be completely decoupled from the POTUS, but that's not how it will play out, optically.

i didn't like it when Starr investigation wandered aimlessly, like some marauding tank - and i didn't like it when Gowdy's multi million dollar investigation meandered far afield (emails!!! private servers!!!!! ARRRRGHHHH!!!!!!).

i don't much like it now either.

- IGIT
He was a senior white house adviser during the campaign and the president's son in-law and the potential financial crimes could be linked to the campaign and the core investigation. We just don't know.
 
I think Mueller is staying much more focused than Starr, and I also think this is a much more serious matter than a fucking land deal in Arkansas.

Also also, Mueller is a lifetime Republican. Starr was a Republican operative after a Democratic President. Starr was fishing, Mueller is actually doing a reasonable, thorough investigation.

That's got to be a hard no for me, dog.

hiya Homer again,

i found the Starr investigation absurd, my friend. Mr. Starr's party doesn't seem relevant, unless you're saying party affiliation, by default, corrupts the judicial process.

i think the Mueller investigation is important, necessary, and completely legitimate - i just don't want to wake up tomorrow and read that Mueller has now uncovered breathtaking details about Ivanka buying her way out of a speeding ticket back in 2012.

- IGIT
 
hiya Homer again,

i found the Starr investigation absurd, my friend. Mr. Starr's party doesn't seem relevant, unless you're saying party affiliation, by default, corrupts the judicial process.

i think the Mueller investigation is important, necessary, and completely legitimate - i just don't want to wake up tomorrow and read that Mueller has now uncovered breathtaking details about Ivanka buying her way out of a speeding ticket back in 2012.

- IGIT
I'm, not saying he was a Republican, I'm saying he was a Republican operative. The entire point of Whitewater was to bring down Clinton. The point of the Russia probe is to find out who did what during the election. It's a much different investigation.

I don't think we'll see Mueller behaving like Starr at all.
 
There is nothing coming of this. There is no valid information at this point and you've made a thread on it.
 
I'm, not saying he was a Republican, I'm saying he was a Republican operative. The entire point of Whitewater was to bring down Clinton. The point of the Russia probe is to find out who did what during the election. It's a much different investigation.

Man the cognitive dissonance is real.

anyway, back to ignoring you nerds.
 
He was a senior white house adviser during the campaign and the president's son in-law and the potential financial crimes could be linked to the campaign and the core investigation. We just don't know.

hiho kpt018,

...and if there is proven to be linkage between Kushner's financial malfeasance and the thrust of the Russian investigation, i'd consider it pretty relevant.

if there is no linkage between the two, though, then i'm just going to say its unfortunate that this tangential issue which has nothing to do with the premise of the investigation will end up further corroding the perception of the POTUS.

when the Democrats retake the executive office (whenever that may be) i'd like to see this kind of judicial broad based approach to special investigations come to an end - so, just to make sure i'm not a hypocrite, it might as well end now.

- IGIT
 
Last edited:
hiho kpt018,

...and it there is proven to be linkage between Kushner's financial malfeasance and the thrust of the Russian investigation, i'd consider it pretty relevant.

if there is no linkage between the two, though, then i'm just going to say its unfortunate that this tangential issue which has nothing to do with the premise of the investigation will end up further corroding the perception of the POTUS.

when the Democrats retake the executive office (whenever that may be) i'd like to see this kind of judicial broad based approach to special investigations come to an end - so, just to make sure i'm not a hypocrite, it might as well end now.

- IGIT
I hear ya, but even if there is no connection I still finding it satisfying to see scumbags get locked up (if of course he's guilty of anything, we'll see).

As long as they're investigating actual wrong doing and not just using courts and investigations as political attacks and smear campaigns I'm fine with it.
 
Thanks for the contribution. Now, back to the kiddie table with you.

No problem, just make threads that have something going on in them. Otherwise I'm sure this could go into the other investigation thread that's also full of nothing.
 
Washington (CNN)Special counsel Robert Mueller's interest in Jared Kushner has expanded beyond his contacts with Russia and now includes his efforts to secure financing for his company from foreign investors during the presidential transition, according to people familiar with the inquiry.

This is the first indication that Mueller is exploring Kushner's discussions with potential non-Russian foreign investors, including in China.
US officials briefed on the probe had told CNN in May that points of focus related to Kushner, the White House senior adviser and son-in-law of President Donald Trump, included the Trump campaign's 2016 data analytics operation, his relationship with former national security adviser Michael Flynn, and Kushner's own contacts with Russians.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/19/poli...-kushner-foreign-financing-efforts/index.html

<BronTroll1>



Kushner will be indicted relatively soon. It's fantastic to see all these swamp creatures getting drowned in their own delusion.


If i had a dollar for every politician that tried to use their position to make money, I would be a billionaire.

If you can't catch the whale go after the minnows.
 
hiya Homer again,

i found the Starr investigation absurd, my friend. Mr. Starr's party doesn't seem relevant, unless you're saying party affiliation, by default, corrupts the judicial process.

i think the Mueller investigation is important, necessary, and completely legitimate - i just don't want to wake up tomorrow and read that Mueller has now uncovered breathtaking details about Ivanka buying her way out of a speeding ticket back in 2012.

- IGIT

I don't understand what you're saying here. Can you elaborate?

And I think the dark underbelly of this investigation is what financial crimes -- like money laundering -- Trump might be connected to. I don't think I need to tell you what a major issue it would be if a nation known for applying pressure with Kompromat had proof of criminal activity to leverage against a sitting president.

Trump needs to be cleared if he is clean because there is certainly nothing (including his own actions) suggesting that he is.
 
I hear ya, but even if there is no connection I still finding it satisfying to see scumbags get locked up (if of course he's guilty of anything, we'll see).

As long as they're investigating actual wrong doing
and not just using courts and investigations as political attacks and smear campaigns I'm fine with it.

hi again kpt018,

i empathize with your POV, kpt018. i hear ya too, matey.

its the bolded part that bugs me. that kind of mandate allows for a really, realllllllly broad investigation. potentially endless. i don't want that gun turned on my guy, is all.

i mean, imagine if someone Ken Starr had that kind of power? aye? a democratic POTUS might find himself getting impeached for getting a blowjob.

- IGIT
 
I don't understand what you're saying here. Can you elaborate?

hi JosephDredd,

sure thing, Joseph.

i'm saying that if Kushner is shown to have engaged in any financial misdoings in the scope of a broadening investigation, and those misdoings have no bearing whatsoever on the Russian investigation, then i think the two things should be decoupled in the public's eye.

but that won't be the case - and i think that sort of thing is unfortunate.

- IGIT
 
hi again kpt018,

i empathize with your POV, kpt018. i hear ya too, matey.

its the bolded part that bugs me. that kind of mandate allows for a really, realllllllly broad investigation. potentially endless. i don't want that gun turned on my guy, is all.

i mean, imagine if someone Ken Starr had that kind of power? aye? a democratic POTUS might find himself getting impeached for getting a blowjob.

- IGIT
Well no, that's not what I'm saying. If Kush daddy goes down for some type of fraud or something it's worthwhile. If they're investigating him because he used a Russian prostitute or something I'd agree with you.

What is being hinted at is bigger than what you're worried about. We'll see where it goes, but it doesn't sound like nonsense at this point.
 
Back
Top