- Joined
- Feb 27, 2016
- Messages
- 198
- Reaction score
- 18
Searching these forums, I have found a lot of anti-Krav Maga posts calling it BS, saying it doesn't work, and the like. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, as am I, so I can't hold my tongue when Krav Maga is slandered without first being properly understood.
I am a Krav Maga instructor. I have trained in the art since 2007 within various organisations and gyms. In 2010, I gained my certification, in Israel, to train civilians. My background includes an extensive history of training in Boxing, and training in BJJ and TKD.
First and foremost, the hate on Krav Maga seems to stem from people who have attended one of the many commercial gyms and hated it, those who don't know much about it, and those who have done their research and don't agree with it.
A lot of what you see today as Krav Maga, is not or does not follow the true principles behind the art. Many places are now certifying instructors to teach Krav Maga in a weekend, no matter what their combat training background is. One place allows you to pay $5000 and become a Krav Maga instructor in 2 days, no experience necessary. It is a f#cking joke.
Don't get me wrong, there are many places who teach a "real-deal" style of KM, but the more and more I see, the more and more I think they are trying to distance themselves from original KM. In theory, KM should be changing and evolving as new effective techniques are developed upon. However, these quick KM gyms are teaching BS. Absolute BS at times.
In Israel, Krav Maga is much more brutal then it is in many Western gyms. They often teach a hard, forceful way of fighting in Israel and this is the way it should be. Beginners should always be exposed to the techniques very thoroughly before engaging in sparring and so forth, but once a fair amount of the techniques are picked up on, the student should be exposed to a fair amount of contact. You can learn all the techniques you want in the world, but the minute you first get smashed in the f#cking head in the street, you will freak out, and forget all the sh#t you learnt. So, intermediate students and above should be subjected to a fair deal of sparring.
Israel emphasises this. It emphasises so much on sparring and full contact, especially with its soldiers. Training with soldiers, I experienced a rushed, full contact sparring session that was intense and brutal. It did not feel good, and to be honest, it shouldn't. I remember being flustered, disturbed, and shaken up by the speed and brutality of the IDF men and women. In the Western gyms I have been too, some do spar alot but many ignore this and their students leave the gym feeling confident...until they get hit the f#cking head.
People ask, what is better? BJJ or KM. MT or KM. MMA or KM.
The answer? KM should be the same as all of them. The idea behind KM is to take what is useful from any other martial art, alter it to suit a street-based-self-defence [and not a ruled-governed sport]. If something is effective in BJJ, or MT, or any of it, it should be part of KM to suit the streets.
In other words, KM is MMA; just adapted to include techniques that would be illegal in an MMA sport. Krav Maga is meant to be a hybrid, mixed martial art taking techniques from every other martial arts, except we will bite, we will target the groin, we will plunge thumbs and fingers into eye sockets, we will smash people in the throat and base of the skull.
KM is MMA that does what is necessary to try and neutralise a threat. My instructor in Israel said it perfectly:
"Punch him, kick him, if you have a bat hit him, if you have a pen stab him."
Use what you can and do what you can to neutralise the threat. This is Krav Maga.
I do, however, have one complaint with the majority of KM gyms. Many will teach you how to defend against and fight off opponents, and get out of the situation as fast as you can. The idea is that you neutralise the attack AND remove yourself from the area AND this is to be done using 6-7 strikes AND be over within several seconds.
A guy comes up to you in the street and throws a hook punch. KM says block the hook, simultaneously punch him in the chest or face, continue to circle him while punching, push him away and run.
A guy comes up and grabs you by the throat. KM says to release the choke [using an actual effective technique], control one hand, kick or knee the groin, strike the head several times, circle around, and run.
A guy comes up with a knife. KM says do the knife technique, strike and strike and maybe even stab if you have the knife now, and run away.
This can go on and on...
Are these techniques useless and BS? Absolutely not so go f#ck yourself if you think they are. Go try them and train in them and really appreciate their effectiveness.
But...
What KM does not teach, or rather what KM instructors do not teach, is what to do should your opponent be a trained fighter. Like an expert fighter.
A guy comes up, throws a hook punch, you block it and go to throw the counter and he blocks that and unleashes a brutal combo of punches and kicks. Suddenly you are standing toe to toe about to engage in a solid MMA bout. The fight may not only last several seconds now and you may be required to use more than several strikes to neutralise your attacker. Barely any KM gyms teach these scenarios.
So is KM perfect? No.
The idea behind it is highly effective and when taught properly, can teach you highly valuable techniques that save your life. It could be the determining factor between being glassed or stabbed, or a woman being raped, or a child being abducted BUT IT DOES NOT guarantee you will be safe or "win" every situation, and unfortunately many places do not create hypothetical situations where you will come against a highly trained fighter.
When I teach KM, I will teach all the techniques for the disarms and blocks and counter attacks and so forth, but I also emphasis a lot of MMA-sport-based training that includes toe-to-toe sparring that might extend several minutes and require numerous strikes, grappling, etc.
This is just my 2 cents based on my experience and views on KM.
I am a Krav Maga instructor. I have trained in the art since 2007 within various organisations and gyms. In 2010, I gained my certification, in Israel, to train civilians. My background includes an extensive history of training in Boxing, and training in BJJ and TKD.
First and foremost, the hate on Krav Maga seems to stem from people who have attended one of the many commercial gyms and hated it, those who don't know much about it, and those who have done their research and don't agree with it.
A lot of what you see today as Krav Maga, is not or does not follow the true principles behind the art. Many places are now certifying instructors to teach Krav Maga in a weekend, no matter what their combat training background is. One place allows you to pay $5000 and become a Krav Maga instructor in 2 days, no experience necessary. It is a f#cking joke.
Don't get me wrong, there are many places who teach a "real-deal" style of KM, but the more and more I see, the more and more I think they are trying to distance themselves from original KM. In theory, KM should be changing and evolving as new effective techniques are developed upon. However, these quick KM gyms are teaching BS. Absolute BS at times.
In Israel, Krav Maga is much more brutal then it is in many Western gyms. They often teach a hard, forceful way of fighting in Israel and this is the way it should be. Beginners should always be exposed to the techniques very thoroughly before engaging in sparring and so forth, but once a fair amount of the techniques are picked up on, the student should be exposed to a fair amount of contact. You can learn all the techniques you want in the world, but the minute you first get smashed in the f#cking head in the street, you will freak out, and forget all the sh#t you learnt. So, intermediate students and above should be subjected to a fair deal of sparring.
Israel emphasises this. It emphasises so much on sparring and full contact, especially with its soldiers. Training with soldiers, I experienced a rushed, full contact sparring session that was intense and brutal. It did not feel good, and to be honest, it shouldn't. I remember being flustered, disturbed, and shaken up by the speed and brutality of the IDF men and women. In the Western gyms I have been too, some do spar alot but many ignore this and their students leave the gym feeling confident...until they get hit the f#cking head.
People ask, what is better? BJJ or KM. MT or KM. MMA or KM.
The answer? KM should be the same as all of them. The idea behind KM is to take what is useful from any other martial art, alter it to suit a street-based-self-defence [and not a ruled-governed sport]. If something is effective in BJJ, or MT, or any of it, it should be part of KM to suit the streets.
In other words, KM is MMA; just adapted to include techniques that would be illegal in an MMA sport. Krav Maga is meant to be a hybrid, mixed martial art taking techniques from every other martial arts, except we will bite, we will target the groin, we will plunge thumbs and fingers into eye sockets, we will smash people in the throat and base of the skull.
KM is MMA that does what is necessary to try and neutralise a threat. My instructor in Israel said it perfectly:
"Punch him, kick him, if you have a bat hit him, if you have a pen stab him."
Use what you can and do what you can to neutralise the threat. This is Krav Maga.
I do, however, have one complaint with the majority of KM gyms. Many will teach you how to defend against and fight off opponents, and get out of the situation as fast as you can. The idea is that you neutralise the attack AND remove yourself from the area AND this is to be done using 6-7 strikes AND be over within several seconds.
A guy comes up to you in the street and throws a hook punch. KM says block the hook, simultaneously punch him in the chest or face, continue to circle him while punching, push him away and run.
A guy comes up and grabs you by the throat. KM says to release the choke [using an actual effective technique], control one hand, kick or knee the groin, strike the head several times, circle around, and run.
A guy comes up with a knife. KM says do the knife technique, strike and strike and maybe even stab if you have the knife now, and run away.
This can go on and on...
Are these techniques useless and BS? Absolutely not so go f#ck yourself if you think they are. Go try them and train in them and really appreciate their effectiveness.
But...
What KM does not teach, or rather what KM instructors do not teach, is what to do should your opponent be a trained fighter. Like an expert fighter.
A guy comes up, throws a hook punch, you block it and go to throw the counter and he blocks that and unleashes a brutal combo of punches and kicks. Suddenly you are standing toe to toe about to engage in a solid MMA bout. The fight may not only last several seconds now and you may be required to use more than several strikes to neutralise your attacker. Barely any KM gyms teach these scenarios.
So is KM perfect? No.
The idea behind it is highly effective and when taught properly, can teach you highly valuable techniques that save your life. It could be the determining factor between being glassed or stabbed, or a woman being raped, or a child being abducted BUT IT DOES NOT guarantee you will be safe or "win" every situation, and unfortunately many places do not create hypothetical situations where you will come against a highly trained fighter.
When I teach KM, I will teach all the techniques for the disarms and blocks and counter attacks and so forth, but I also emphasis a lot of MMA-sport-based training that includes toe-to-toe sparring that might extend several minutes and require numerous strikes, grappling, etc.
This is just my 2 cents based on my experience and views on KM.