- Joined
- Jan 31, 2006
- Messages
- 1,646
- Reaction score
- 0
This is off topic but there is a dilemma when you have a guy from another art crossing over who has the skills to hang with our beat your black belts. But at the same time, black belts in most TMAs are about more than just fighting skill. Things like knowledge of the history of the art, understanding of the philosophy of the art (if applicable), how they represent martial arts or that art as a whole, and how much they contribute to the growing of the art.
I know on Sherdog, most of this stuff wouldn't matter since its all about fighting. But for some instructors that stuff is just as important as fighting ability. So you run into cases like Josh Barnett who has a black belt in BJJ officially speaking but came up through catch wrestling for a majority of his skillset.
In my view, the solution is to admit that BJJ belt rankings are not universal metrics of grappling ability. They are simply indicators of proficiency in BJJ.
A grappler who has mastered other disciplines (e.g., wrestling) may be able to use his mat skills to defeat a BJJJ black belt. But unless he demonstrates mastery of core BJJ techniques (e.g., the guard, collar chokes), he doesn't deserve a black belt in BJJ himself.