• Xenforo Cloud is upgrading us to version 2.3.8 on Monday February 16th, 2026 at 12:00 AM PST. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

Khabib claims McGregor vs Alvarez was 'fixed'

Eddie got starched. He's simply not on the level of Conor.
 
Conor ko's just about everybody like this...same exact way...slips a punch, nails you with his left hand...

Yeah its almost like he's trained to do that.


Crazy.
 
"striking legend"

striking legend that lost once to nate and barely got past him on the second fight

{<jordan}

jesus christ, you mcgregor fans are fucking nuts
Nate has a steel chin. Otherwise he would have been toast as well as all of Conor's other victims.
 
"he catch him a few times and he falls down—to me this is a fake fight"

Jesus.....striking really is Khabib's Achilles heel!
 
Ok so Khabib will be the next one to underestimate Conor's striking power/timing/precision ?

You'd think he'd learn from what he has seen Conor do in the cage.

Ehhh it's better this way.
I love to see the surprised look on their faces when they first feel that left hand shot.

Agreed, its funnier seeing all these guys who underestimate him having that wake up call. That "Santa clause is real" look on Alvarez's face after the first time he got dropped was priceless.
 
Yep Khabib and Ferguson have earned the right to be called the two best fighters at lightweight right now. I like Mcgregor but he has 1 win in the UFC lightweight division and it's over a guy that got his ass beat by Cerrone then got a title shot by winning 2 split decisions.
And he then banged out the Champion in the 1st. I'm not even Eddies biggest fan as that fight with Pettis was boring as hell but he earned that title, he has beaten more top fighters than Khabib so no, having a padded record against bums doesn't mean you get to call yourself the best in the division.
 
And he then banged out the Champion in the 1st. I'm not even Eddies biggest fan as that fight with Pettis was boring as hell but he earned that title, he has beaten more top fighters than Khabib so no, having a padded record against bums doesn't mean you get to call yourself the best in the division.

And Ferguson and Nurmagomedov could only win by decision against dos Anjos.

God bless MMAth.
 
Agreed, its funnier seeing all these guys who underestimate him having that wake up call. That "Santa clause is real" look on Alvarez's face after the first time he got dropped was priceless.

Yeah it was. That double tap left had him looking for the Easter bunny too.
 
And I think by fake meaning conor did not have to work his way to the championship fight - did not defend his 145 and took 2 fights with Nate and we were lead to believe that he would after the 2nd Nate fight - but got a free shot against a stylistically perfect and one of the weakest champs in 155 memory without having to work his way there. Then decides to take time off after winning the 155.


"Weakest champ" who destroyed the guy who destroyed Bendo, Pettis and Coyboy.

God people will do anything to make Conor's history making win look bad. And for no reason.

Yes he should defend his belt. But don't mix it up. He still slaughtered Jose Aldo and Eddie in under two rounds combined. That's a fucking accomplishment.
 
Ok so Khabib will be the next one to underestimate Conor's striking power/timing/precision ?

You'd think he'd learn from what he has seen Conor do in the cage.

Ehhh it's better this way.
I love to see the surprised look on their faces when they first feel that left hand shot.


Then it's a slam dunk for Conor.

Great there should be no reason for this fight to not happen if khabib wins tomorrow.
 
“100 per cent I think this is real title fight,” Nurmagomedov said, speaking about this weekend’s fight with Ferguson. “I don’t care about him [McGregor], you guys know his Uncle Dana give him a gift. He jumped over all contenders and he fought for the title. I do not understand this fight [McGregor vs. Alvarez], he catch him a few times and he falls down—to me this is a fake fight."

http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...rez-fixed-ufc-209-tony-ferguson-a7607201.html

I'm not the only one who had questions about that fight. I even made a topic about it and it got deleted for expressing my opinion.
If Khabib keeps talking bad about the UFC, UFC will do Conor vs Nate 3 and have Khabib fight Salty Aldo. LMAO
 
"Weakest champ" who destroyed the guy who destroyed Bendo, Pettis and Coyboy.

God people will do anything to make Conor's history making win look bad. And for no reason.

Yes he should defend his belt. But don't mix it up. He still slaughtered Jose Aldo and Eddie in under two rounds combined. That's a fucking accomplishment.


That was a good win but Aldo deserves a re-match. Conor got one after being choked out by Nate. Just because he won that fight does not mean he will beat him every time. I think Aldo beats him if they ever fight again.
 
Then it's a slam dunk for Conor.

Great there should be no reason for this fight to not happen if khabib wins tomorrow.

It's the fight I'm rooting for also.
If the Floyd payday doesn't happen, this will.
 
"Weakest champ" who destroyed the guy who destroyed Bendo, Pettis and Coyboy.

God people will do anything to make Conor's history making win look bad. And for no reason.

Yes he should defend his belt. But don't mix it up. He still slaughtered Jose Aldo and Eddie in under two rounds combined. That's a fucking accomplishment.
MMA math is great isn't it? RDA leaves a lot of openings. Eddie was able to land and then threw technique out the window and threw everything he had at RDA because he knew it was his only chance to win. Why wasn't Eddie able to take Cowboy out in the first round or dominate pettis like RDA did?
 
"striking legend"

striking legend that lost once to nate and barely got past him on the second fight

{<jordan}

jesus christ, you mcgregor fans are fucking nuts
You say that as if Nate is some sort of scrub on his feet? He batters almost anyone on the feet and has only been outstruck by one other guy (Thompson) where he got his tactics wrong.

Connor may or may not be a striking legend, but shaming his win (by striking) over Nate doesn't prove anything.
 
You say that as if Nate is some sort of scrub on his feet? He batters almost anyone on the feet and has only been outstruck by one other guy (Thompson) where he got his tactics wrong.

Connor may or may not be a striking legend, but shaming his win (by striking) over Nate doesn't prove anything.
nate is a journeyman that has been thoroughly dominated by truly elite fighters like henderson, RDA and thomson

it's not about "may or may not be", he isn't a striking legend and that's it, that is just a fact
 
Back
Top