This and this.There's no doubt his record is extremely padded, but you also can't deny his ground game is on a completely other level.
It will be a very interesting fight.
Fuck ov you racist.11 of those 16 guys has a name that ends in "ov". So does Khabib.
So what's your point? That as an up and comer from the age of 20 to 23 he was fighting other up and coming fighters?
Not sure whose mickey you're trying to nibble with this but if it's Conor's, please show us how amazing his quality of opponent was in his pre UFC fights
I'll give you a hand
0-0
0-0
0-1
2-1
1-1
4-1
1-1
4-6
11-4
2-1
6-1
10-1
21-2
And guess how many of the ones with shit records still have shit records?
Amazingly, we all have to start out somewhere
You're he delusional one. You look crazy when you post stuff like that. NO ONE can argue his record is not padded, and I like Khabib and sort of hope he wins.Khabib didn't have the opportunity to fight better opponents early on before entering the UFC, since coming into the UFC he has dominated every single fighter in his path one of the deepest divisions. People calling his record 'padded' (after never losing a round or fight in the UFC) are deluding themselves.
There's no doubt his record is extremely padded, but you also can't deny his ground game is on a completely other level.
It will be a very interesting fight.
I didn't realize just how padded Khabib's record was until this informative thread. Why are you so upset?So what's your point? That as an up and comer from the age of 20 to 23 he was fighting other up and coming fighters?
Not sure whose mickey you're trying to nibble with this but if it's Conor's, please show us how amazing his quality of opponent was in his pre UFC fights
I'll give you a hand
0-0
0-0
0-1
2-1
1-1
4-1
1-1
4-6
11-4
2-1
6-1
10-1
21-2
And guess how many of the ones with shit records still have shit records?
Amazingly, we all have to start out somewhere