Rafael Dos Anjos, Michael Johnson, Edson Barboza, and Al Iaquinta are all quality wins and are big names in the sport. There's no denying before the UFC his record has complete nobodies, but to say he has absolutely zero quality wins is simply not true.the competition the UFC put him in there with either, he's literally beaten nobody
saying his record post UFC is padded delusional after what he has accomplished in the Octagon. Also this image needs some context. Khabib's early record is mainly from tournaments where he was fighting two to three guys a night. For example Khabib fought at PAC1 - he fought three guys in one night (won all via unanimous decision), He fought at TFC 3 - two fights in one night (won all by TKO), etc.You're he delusional one. You look crazy when you post stuff like that. NO ONE can argue his record is not padded, and I like Khabib and sort of hope he wins.
Getting experience as a young fighter is not padding your record, it's fighting your way to an opportunity that may eventually open itself up to you.I didn't realize just how padded Khabib's record was until this informative thread. Why are you so upset?
No shit sherlock, chill and laugh while holding this LTS is an idiot...
Almost everyone fights lesser quality/lesser known opponents at the beginning of their professional career.
They also start their careers fighting people from their region in smaller, local circuits before moving on to international shows/promotions.
No shit sherlock, chill and laugh while holding this L
I think even the conor haters will admit this...if khabib has a difficult time getting conor down and keeping him down, khabib is going to have a very tough night...the longer this stays on the feet, the worse it is for khabib...I think everyone can agree on that.. and I suspect conor is training his grappling a ton for this fight...and yes, it will make a huge difference..
Thank fuck, you came in to invested bro.I’m chilling and laughing at your idiocy...
I never said his post UFC record was padded, dipshit. And if you think I'm reading all that you're even dumber than I first imaginedsaying his record post UFC is padded delusional after what he has accomplished in the Octagon. Also this image needs some context. Khabib's early record is mainly from tournaments where he was fighting two to three guys a night. For example Khabib fought at PAC1 - he fought three guys in one night (won all via unanimous decision), He fought at TFC 3 - two fights in one night (won all by TKO), etc.
All that matters that Khabib is dominating in the biggest most respected organization in the world sure his pre-UFC competition wasn't the best because he was fighting in small tournaments and leagues that were local but he's dominating and humiliating guys who have better resumes pre-UFC so it really kind of meaningless.
For the first 10 or so fights, sure. What about after that? It's called padding, lots of fighters do it and it's fine. But acting like that's not what's going on makes you look pathetic and unable to handle realityGetting experience as a young fighter is not padding your record, it's fighting your way to an opportunity that may eventually open itself up to you.
I'm thinking you're a bit of a dickFor the first 10 or so fights, sure. What about after that? It's called padding, lots of fighters do it and it's fine. But acting like that's not what's going on makes you look pathetic and unable to handle reality
What's your point? Shamhalaev is a great fighter and went on to fight for a world title in Bellator.
This white belt makes sense.Khabib didn't have the opportunity to fight better opponents early on before entering the UFC, since coming into the UFC he has dominated every single fighter in his path one of the deepest divisions. People calling his record 'padded' (after never losing a round or fight in the UFC) are deluding themselves.