Several things going on there, and he's obviously still bent about the Broner card. Thanks for sharing. It's funny, I find it easier to understand Paulie when he talks, reading transcripts of his statements hurts my head. The psychology and sociology aspects of scoring fights is fascinating to me.
I agree that card was too wide, but it was a hard to score round by round fight. This is the problem when you have subjective scoring- does the fighter moving forward get too much credit, flashy combos that largely land on the arms, etc. After a lopsided 6 rounds, if the 7th is close, do we give credit to momentum, to a fighter that was suddenly more competitive? How do the previous 6 rounds not impact the scoring of the 7th? When Byrd slips 6 punches but gets cracked by the 7th...
This underscores a problem I have with fighters and trainers in the booth. They bring their own shit into the booth and can't let go. Goosen, who was good, could not put aside his bias in the Tug fight. That blow could have landed on the bottom of the shorts and Goosen would have called it legit. Unless we are already educated about the bias, or they are open about their history and bias (which Goosen was) you don't know to take it with a grain of salt. Casual fans (put aside how many casual fans were watching Thurman...) walk away thinking the blow was legit- Goosen said so. The same problem existed when HBO cash cows were fighting- Lampley would often ignore the other fighter and when you listen to him you think its a runaway. Compubox is a whole different misleading can of worms-- come on Jim, not all 'power shots' are created equally...
I've encountered similar problems watching fights with people who don't score rounds, but watch the fight as a whole. Considering it as 12 separate fights for scoring can lead to a much different perception than viewing it as one fight, ignoring the round by round. Tarver-RJJ one is a classic example. Scoring the fight I think RJJ won by a slim margin, but would be ok the other way. Watching the fight with three friends who just watched the fight, they thought it was Tarver and not even close.
Then there is our bias. Who did we want to win before we watched, and how does that impact our scoring? (Huge RJJ fan and didn't like Tarver). I watched Raheem-Morales in an arena full of partying Mexican fans. Every shot Morales threw resulted in a huge uproar. I remember thinking this place is going to riot when they announce (hopefully) that Raheem won.